Spine Surgery with Electronic Conductivity Device: A Prospectively Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial and Literature Review

Overview

Journal Orthop Surg

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2023 Sep 22

PMID 37735987

Authors

Xiao Zhai

Bo Li

Ziqiang Chen

Jie Shao

Kai Chen

Qintong Xu

Dehua Meng

Qinming Fei

Leisheng Jiang

Yushu Bai

Ming Li

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: Improving accuracy and safety of pedicle screw placement is of great clinical importance. Electronic conductivity device (ECD) can be a promising technique with features of affordability, portability, and real-time detection capabilities. This study aimed to validate the safety and effectiveness of a modified ECD.

Methods: The ECD underwent a modification where six lamps of various colors, and it was utilized in a prospectively multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial involving 96 patients across three hospitals from June 2018 to December 2018. The trial incorporated a self-control randomization with an equal distribution of left or right side of vertebral pedicle among two groups: the free-hand group and the ECD group. A total of 496 pedicle screws were inserted, with 248 inserted in each group. The primary outcomes focused on the accuracy of pedicle screw placement and the frequency of intraoperative X-rays. Meanwhile, the secondary indicator measured the time required for pedicle screw placement. Results were presented as means ± SD. Paired samples t-test and χ -test were used for comparison. Furthermore, an updated review was conducted, which included studies published from 2006 onwards.

Results: Baseline patient characteristics were recorded. The primary accuracy outcome revealed a 96.77% accuracy rate in the ECD group, compared to a 95.16% accuracy rate in the free-hand group, with no significant differences noted. In contrast, ECD demonstrated a significant reduction in radiation exposure frequency when compared to the free-hand group (1.11 ± 0.32 vs. 1.30 ± 0.53; p < 0.001), resulting in a 14.6% reduction. Moreover, ECD displayed a decrease of 30.38% in insertion time (70.88 ± 30.51 vs. 101.82 ± 54.00 s; p < 0.001). According to the results of the 21 studies, ECD has been utilized in various areas of the spine such as the atlas, thoracic and lumbar spine, as well as sacral 2-alar-iliac. The accuracy of ECD ranged from 85% to 100%.

Conclusion: The prospectively randomized trial and the review indicate that the use of ECD presents a secure and precise approach to the placement of pedicle screws, with the added benefit of reducing both procedure time and radiation exposure.

References

Hartl R, Lam K, Wang J, Korge A, Kandziora F, Audige L . Worldwide survey on the use of navigation in spine surgery. World Neurosurg. 2012; 79(1):162-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.03.011. View

Chaput C, George K, Samdani A, Williams J, Gaughan J, Betz R . Reduction in radiation (fluoroscopy) while maintaining safe placement of pedicle screws during lumbar spine fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012; 37(21):E1305-9. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182666adc. View

Sallent A, Ramirez M, Catala J, Rodriguez-Baeza A, Bago J, de Albert M . Precision and safety of Multilevel Cervical Transpedicular Screw Fixation with 3D Patient-Specific Guides; A Cadaveric Study. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):15686. PMC: 6821841. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-51936-w. View

Rawicki N, Dowdell J, Sandhu H . Current state of navigation in spine surgery. Ann Transl Med. 2021; 9(1):85. PMC: 7859779. DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-1335. View

Suess O, Schomacher M . Control of Pedicle Screw Placement with an Electrical Conductivity Measurement Device: Initial Evaluation in the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. Adv Med. 2016; 2016:4296294. PMC: 5028864. DOI: 10.1155/2016/4296294. View

Cawley D, Dhokia R, Sales J, Darwish N, Molloy S . Ten techniques for improving navigated spinal surgery. Bone Joint J. 2020; 102-B(3):371-375. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B3.BJJ-2019-1499.R1. View

Chiang H, Wu R, Yin T, Li J, Wang Y, Lin L . Occupational radiation exposure of orthopedists at different locations during pedicle screw insertion: An anthropomorphic phantom study. Technol Health Care. 2021; 29(S1):211-219. PMC: 8150624. DOI: 10.3233/THC-218021. View

Baymurat A, Yapar A, Kilicaslan O, Tokgoz M, Selcuk H, Yas S . Intermittent pedicle screw application provides better kyphosis restoration in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis for Lenke type 1 and type 2 curves. Eur Spine J. 2023; 32(6):2213-2220. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07669-6. View

Gertzbein S, Robbins S . Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990; 15(1):11-4. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199001000-00004. View

10.

Kageyama H, Yoshimura S, Matsuda K, Yoshida Y, Matsukawa H, Yamada K . Usefulness of a New Electronic Conductivity Device with a Pedicle Probe and a Multi-axis Angiography Unit for Inserting a C1 Lateral Mass Screw Safely and Tightly: A Technical Note. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2019; 59(12):523-528. PMC: 6923162. DOI: 10.2176/nmc.tn.2019-0025. View

11.

Allaoui M, Zairi F, Tetard M, Gaughan J, Chopin D, Assaker R . Contribution of Dynamic Surgical Guidance to the Accurate Placement of Pedicle Screws in Deformity Surgery: A Retrospective Case Series. World Neurosurg. 2018; 120:e466-e471. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.105. View

12.

Zeller R, Canavese F, Kulkarni A, Drake J . Technique for drilling instrument monitoring electrical conductivity in pediatric cervical spine screw insertion: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Orthop. 2010; 29(7):760-4. DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181b768c3. View

13.

Bolger C, Kelleher M, McEvoy L, Brayda-Bruno M, Kaelin A, Lazennec J . Electrical conductivity measurement: a new technique to detect iatrogenic initial pedicle perforation. Eur Spine J. 2007; 16(11):1919-24. PMC: 2223337. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0409-8. View

14.

Koller H, Hitzl W, Acosta F, Tauber M, Zenner J, Resch H . In vitro study of accuracy of cervical pedicle screw insertion using an electronic conductivity device (ATPS part III). Eur Spine J. 2009; 18(9):1300-13. PMC: 2899545. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1054-1. View

15.

Lebhar J, Bryand C, Breton Y, Bourgouin A, Chatellier P, Ropars M . Can intraoperative radiation dose in percutaneous posterior thoracolumbar internal fixation be reduced by impedancemetry-guided pedicle sighting? A prospective randomized study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022; 109(2):103250. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103250. View

16.

Kageyama H, Yoshimura S, Tatebayashi K, Iida T, Yamada K . Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement Comparing an Electronic Conductivity Device and a Multi-axis Angiography Unit with C-arm Fluoroscopy in Lumbar Fixation Surgery for Safety. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2021; 61(5):334-340. PMC: 8120099. DOI: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2020-0374. View

17.

Ul Haque M, Shufflebarger H, OBrien M, Macagno A . Radiation exposure during pedicle screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: is fluoroscopy safe?. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(21):2516-20. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000238675.91612.2f. View

18.

Gelalis I, Paschos N, Pakos E, Politis A, Arnaoutoglou C, Karageorgos A . Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques. Eur Spine J. 2011; 21(2):247-55. PMC: 3265579. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-2011-3. View

19.

Jiang J, Chen X, Qiu Y, Wang B, Zhu Z, Yu Y . Accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients using the entry point identified by new landmarks: a computed tomography study. BMC Surg. 2022; 22(1):379. PMC: 9636753. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01827-1. View

20.

Burstrom G, Swamy A, Spliethoff J, Reich C, Babic D, Hendriks B . Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy accurately identifies the pre-cortical zone to avoid impending pedicle screw breach in spinal fixation surgery. Biomed Opt Express. 2019; 10(11):5905-5920. PMC: 6865097. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.10.005905. View