» Articles » PMID: 37733110

Blood Flow Energy Identifies Coronary Lesions Culprit of Future Myocardial Infarction

Abstract

The present study establishes a link between blood flow energy transformations in coronary atherosclerotic lesions and clinical outcomes. The predictive capacity for future myocardial infarction (MI) was compared with that of established quantitative coronary angiography (QCA)-derived predictors. Angiography-based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed on 80 human coronary lesions culprit of MI within 5 years and 108 non-culprit lesions for future MI. Blood flow energy transformations were assessed in the converging flow segment of the lesion as ratios of kinetic and rotational energy values (KER and RER, respectively) at the QCA-identified minimum lumen area and proximal lesion sections. The anatomical and functional lesion severity were evaluated with QCA to derive percentage area stenosis (%AS), vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR), and translesional vFFR (ΔvFFR). Wall shear stress profiles were investigated in terms of topological shear variation index (TSVI). KER and RER predicted MI at 5 years (AUC = 0.73, 95% CI 0.65-0.80, and AUC = 0.76, 95% CI 0.70-0.83, respectively; p < 0.0001 for both). The predictive capacity for future MI of KER and RER was significantly stronger than vFFR (p = 0.0391 and p = 0.0045, respectively). RER predictive capacity was significantly stronger than %AS and ΔvFFR (p = 0.0041 and p = 0.0059, respectively). The predictive capacity for future MI of KER and RER did not differ significantly from TSVI. Blood flow kinetic and rotational energy transformations were significant predictors for MI at 5 years (p < 0.0001). The findings of this study support the hypothesis of a biomechanical contribution to the process of plaque destabilization/rupture leading to MI.

Citing Articles

Advances in the Computational Assessment of Disturbed Coronary Flow and Wall Shear Stress: A Contemporary Review.

Ekmejian A, Carpenter H, Ciofani J, Gray B, Allahwala U, Ward M J Am Heart Assoc. 2024; 13(19):e037129.

PMID: 39291505 PMC: 11681461. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.124.037129.


Association Between Automated 3D Measurement of Coronary Luminal Narrowing and Risk of Future Myocardial Infarction.

Candreva A, Lodi Rizzini M, Calo K, Pagnoni M, Munhoz D, Chiastra C J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2024; 17(4):893-900.

PMID: 38427153 PMC: 11371893. DOI: 10.1007/s12265-024-10500-2.


Prediction of Hemodynamic-Related Hemolysis in Carotid Stenosis and Aiding in Treatment Planning and Risk Stratification Using Computational Fluid Dynamics.

Jedrzejczak K, Orciuch W, Wojtas K, Kozlowski M, Piasecki P, Narloch J Biomedicines. 2024; 12(1).

PMID: 38255144 PMC: 10813079. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12010037.

References
1.
Melchior B, Frangos J . Shear-induced endothelial cell-cell junction inclination. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2010; 299(3):C621-9. PMC: 2944312. DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00156.2010. View

2.
Lodi Rizzini M, Gallo D, De Nisco G, DAscenzo F, Chiastra C, Bocchino P . Does the inflow velocity profile influence physiologically relevant flow patterns in computational hemodynamic models of left anterior descending coronary artery?. Med Eng Phys. 2020; 82:58-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2020.07.001. View

3.
Brandts A, Roes S, Doornbos J, Weiss R, de Roos A, Stuber M . Right coronary artery flow velocity and volume assessment with spiral K-space sampled breathhold velocity-encoded MRI at 3 tesla: accuracy and reproducibility. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010; 31(5):1215-23. PMC: 2922615. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22144. View

4.
Bentzon J, Otsuka F, Virmani R, Falk E . Mechanisms of plaque formation and rupture. Circ Res. 2014; 114(12):1852-66. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.302721. View

5.
Wijpkema J, Dorgelo J, Willems T, Tio R, Jessurun G, Oudkerk M . Discordance between anatomical and functional coronary stenosis severity. Neth Heart J. 2007; 15(1):5-11. PMC: 1847721. View