Decision-making in Surgical Study Designs: a Proposed Decision Algorithm to Aid in the Selection of an Appropriate Research Study Design for a Given Surgical Intervention: the PERFECT Tool
Overview
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
References
1.
Baker P, Jeyapalan R, Jameson S
. The value of national arthroplasty registry data in 2023. Bone Joint J. 2023; 105-B(4):356-360.
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.105B4.BJJ-2022-1190.R2.
View
2.
Simpson A, Howie C, Norrie J
. Surgical trial design - learning curve and surgeon volume: Determining whether inferior results are due to the procedure itself, or delivery of the procedure by the surgeon. Bone Joint Res. 2017; 6(4):194-195.
PMC: 5415901.
DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.64.BJR-2017-0051.
View
3.
Simpson A, Frost H, Norrie J
. Pragmatic surgical studies: are they the New Gold Standard. Bone Joint J. 2018; 100-B(11):1407-1408.
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B11.BJJ-2018-0947.
View
4.
Ghert M
. The reporting of outcomes in randomised controlled trials: The switch and the spin. Bone Joint Res. 2017; 6(10):600-601.
PMC: 5670364.
DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.610.BJR-2017-0296.
View
5.
Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson S, Craig P, Baird J, Blazeby J
. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2021; 374:n2061.
PMC: 8482308.
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.
View