» Articles » PMID: 37731173

Safety and Efficacy of Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase in Stroke Patients with Carotid Tandem Lesions: Results from the AcT Trial

Abstract

Background: Carotid tandem lesions ((TL) ⩾70% stenosis or occlusion) account for 15-20% of acute stroke with large vessel occlusion.

Aims: We investigated the safety and efficacy of intravenous tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg) versus intravenous alteplase (0.9 mg/kg) in patients with carotid TL.

Methods: This is a substudy of the alteplase compared with the tenecteplase trial. Patients with ⩾70% stenosis of the extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) and concomitant occlusion of the intracranial ICA, M1 or M2 segments of the middle cerebral artery on baseline computed tomography angiography (CTA) were included. Primary outcome was 90-day-modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-1. Secondary outcomes were mRS 0-2, mortality, and symptomatic ICH (sICH). Angiographic outcomes were successful recanalization (revised Arterial Occlusive Lesion (rAOL) 2b-3) on first and successful reperfusion (eTICI 2b-3) on final angiographic acquisitions. Multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression was performed.

Results: Among 1577 alteplase versus tenecteplase randomized controlled trial (AcT) patients, 128 (18.8%) had carotid TL. Of these, 93 (72.7%) underwent intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular thrombectomy (IVT + EVT), while 35 (27.3%) were treated with IVT alone. In the IVT + EVT group, tenecteplase was associated with higher odds of 90-day-mRS 0-1 (46.0% vs. 32.6%, adjusted OR (aOR) 3.21; 95% CI = 1.06-9.71) compared with alteplase. No statistically significant differences in rates of mRS 0-2 (aOR 1.53; 95% CI = 0.51-4.55), initial rAOL 2b-3 (16.3% vs. 28.6%), final eTICI 2b-3 (83.7% vs. 85.7%), and mortality (18.0% vs. 16.3%) were found. SICH only occurred in one patient. There were no differences in outcomes between thrombolytic agents in the IVT-only group.

Conclusion: In patients with carotid TL treated with EVT, intravenous tenecteplase may be associated with similar or better clinical outcomes, similar angiographic reperfusion rates, and safety outcomes as compared with alteplase.

Citing Articles

Intravenous thrombolysis with tenecteplase versus alteplase in acute ischemic stroke tandem occlusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current available literature.

Goncalves O, Ferreira M, de Almeida Monteiro G, Soares V, Schmitt L, Batista S J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2025; .

PMID: 40082388 DOI: 10.1007/s11239-025-03084-4.

References
1.
Papanagiotou P, Haussen D, Turjman F, Labreuche J, Piotin M, Kastrup A . Carotid Stenting With Antithrombotic Agents and Intracranial Thrombectomy Leads to the Highest Recanalization Rate in Patients With Acute Stroke With Tandem Lesions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 11(13):1290-1299. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.05.036. View

2.
von Kummer R, Broderick J, Campbell B, Demchuk A, Goyal M, Hill M . The Heidelberg Bleeding Classification: Classification of Bleeding Events After Ischemic Stroke and Reperfusion Therapy. Stroke. 2015; 46(10):2981-6. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010049. View

3.
Tanswell P, Modi N, Combs D, Danays T . Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tenecteplase in fibrinolytic therapy of acute myocardial infarction. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2002; 41(15):1229-45. DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200241150-00001. View

4.
Kvistad C, Naess H, Helleberg B, Idicula T, Hagberg G, Nordby L . Tenecteplase versus alteplase for the management of acute ischaemic stroke in Norway (NOR-TEST 2, part A): a phase 3, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Neurol. 2022; 21(6):511-519. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00124-7. View

5.
Anadani M, Marnat G, Consoli A, Papanagiotou P, Nogueira R, Spiotta A . Endovascular therapy with or without intravenous thrombolysis in acute stroke with tandem occlusion. J Neurointerv Surg. 2021; 14(4):314-320. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-017202. View