» Articles » PMID: 37730384

Young People's Opinions of Cancer Care in England: the BRIGHTLIGHT Cohort

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 Sep 20
PMID 37730384
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The BRIGHTLIGHT cohort study was the national evaluation of cancer services for teenager and young adults (TYA). This was analysis of free-text survey data to better understand their experiences of cancer care.

Design: Cohort study SETTING: National Health Service hospitals delivering cancer care in England PARTICIPANTS: 830 young people newly diagnosed with cancer.

Interventions: Exposure to specialist care in the first 6 months after diagnosis defined as care in a TYA Principal Treatment Centre (PTC). This was categorised as follows: all care in a TYA-PTC (ALL-TYA-PTC), no care in a TYA-PTC (NO-TYA-PTC) so care delivered in a children/adult unit only and some care in a TYA-PTC with additional care in a children's/adult unit (SOME-TYA-PTC).

Primary Outcome: Data were collected through the BRIGHTLIGHT survey included free-text questions which asked patients 'what was the best aspects of their experiences of care' and 'what aspects could be improved'. These comments were analysed using content analysis. Themes were compared between categories of care, then ranked in order of frequency, ranging from the most endorsed to the least.

Results: Overall, young people were most positive about their healthcare team, while the area highlighted for improvement was diagnostic experience. Differences between the three groups suggested those who had some or all treatment in a TYA-PTC valued the place of care. Regardless of where TYA were treated their healthcare teams were favourably viewed. Age appropriate place of care was highlighted to be of value for those in PTCs.

Conclusions: These data show the value young people placed on the care they received in TYA specific wards. Young people who accessed some or all of their care in a TYA-PTC highly endorsed their place of care as one of the best elements of their care, and it is further emphasised by those who had shared care who experienced difficulty with lack of age-appropriate care when treated outside the TYA-PTC.

References
1.
Dommett R, Pring H, Cargill J, Beynon P, Cameron A, Cox R . Achieving a timely diagnosis for teenagers and young adults with cancer: the ACE "too young to get cancer?" study. BMC Cancer. 2019; 19(1):616. PMC: 6591830. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5776-0. View

2.
Lea S, Martins A, Fern L, Bassett M, Cable M, Doig G . The support and information needs of adolescents and young adults with cancer when active treatment ends. BMC Cancer. 2020; 20(1):697. PMC: 7388472. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07197-2. View

3.
Geue K, Schmidt R, Sender A, Sauter S, Friedrich M . Sexuality and romantic relationships in young adult cancer survivors: satisfaction and supportive care needs. Psychooncology. 2015; 24(11):1368-76. DOI: 10.1002/pon.3805. View

4.
Avutu V, Lynch K, Barnett M, Vera J, Glade Bender J, Tap W . Psychosocial Needs and Preferences for Care among Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Patients (Ages 15-39): A Qualitative Study. Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(3). PMC: 8833451. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030710. View

5.
Fern L, Taylor R, Barber J, Alvarez-Galvez J, Feltbower R, Lea S . Processes of care and survival associated with treatment in specialist teenage and young adult cancer centres: results from the BRIGHTLIGHT cohort study. BMJ Open. 2021; 11(4):e044854. PMC: 8031022. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044854. View