» Articles » PMID: 37727427

Students' Approaches to Learning (SALs): Validation and Psychometric Properties of a Tool Measurement

Overview
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2023 Sep 20
PMID 37727427
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Deep learning is an important outcome of the higher education and is mostly determined by students' approaches to learning (SALs). The latest version of the Study Process Questionnaire (SPQ) is one of the most used instruments assessing SALs. Many studies from various contexts have either validated or used this famous tool. But none of them-to the best of our knowledge-stem from the Moroccan tertiary context. The current study fills this gap by first: Getting a local translation of the questionnaire following the standardized methodological process and secondly to update the validity and psychometric properties of the construct.

Materials And Methods: Arabic back translation was performed. Data were collected among tertiary scientific students. Descriptive statistics, Cronbach's coefficient alpha, and confirmatory factor analysis were carried out under SPSS version 22.

Results: A strong fit of the dichotomic construct (deep and surface) was found, whereas the hierarchical models were disappointing.

Conclusions: Following the standards of the psychometrics' validation, this Arabic version could be used only in first-order factor model to evaluate the deep and surface approach within tertiary education in Moroccan context.

Citing Articles

Psychological empowerment-a mechanism for well-being of teachers: Psychometric evaluation of a tool.

Bhattacharya S, Narad A J Educ Health Promot. 2024; 13:392.

PMID: 39703645 PMC: 11657973. DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1682_23.

References
1.
Sousa V, Rojjanasrirat W . Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010; 17(2):268-74. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x. View

2.
Clinton-McHarg T, Yoong S, Tzelepis F, Regan T, Fielding A, Skelton E . Psychometric properties of implementation measures for public health and community settings and mapping of constructs against the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2016; 11(1):148. PMC: 5100177. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-016-0512-5. View

3.
Shah D, Yadav R, Sharma D, Yadav P, Sapkota N, Jha R . Learning approach among health sciences students in a medical college in Nepal: a cross-sectional study. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2016; 7:137-43. PMC: 4786058. DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S100968. View

4.
Maneesriwongul W, Dixon J . Instrument translation process: a methods review. J Adv Nurs. 2004; 48(2):175-86. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03185.x. View

5.
Johnson S, Gallagher E, Vagnozzi A . Validity concerns with the Revised Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) in undergraduate anatomy & physiology students. PLoS One. 2021; 16(4):e0250600. PMC: 8084138. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250600. View