» Articles » PMID: 3772598

The Admission Urinalysis: Impact on Patient Care

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty General Medicine
Date 1986 Jul 1
PMID 3772598
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although urinalysis is one of the most frequently ordered tests in primary care, its usefulness in screening has not been demonstrated. A retrospective review of 1,607 admission urinalyses for inpatients in a referral/community hospital identified 861 as clinically indicated and 746 as routine. Routine urinalyses were abnormal less frequently than clinically indicated urinalyses (18.1% vs 39.6%) and when abnormal, were responded to less often (33.3% vs 75.4%). Forty-five (6.0%) of the routine urinalyses yielded an abnormality that led to diagnostic action. Of these, 18 were normal on repeat testing and 17 were considered unlikely to represent significant disease. Therefore, only ten (1.3%) of the routine urinalyses affected patient therapy. In eight of these cases, the abnormality was pyuria, of which six proved to be asymptomatic bacteriuria. The admission urinalysis as a routine test had little impact on patient care in the authors' institution.

Citing Articles

Urinanalysis (UA): a neglected but easy and inexpensive diagnostic tool.

Gyorik S, Jandus P, Marone C NDT Plus. 2015; 2(5):354-6.

PMID: 25949340 PMC: 4421394. DOI: 10.1093/ndtplus/sfp088.


Screening with urinary dipsticks for reducing morbidity and mortality.

Krogsboll L, Jorgensen K, Gotzsche P Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 1:CD010007.

PMID: 25626128 PMC: 8928469. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010007.pub2.


The questionable value of routine admission urinalyses.

Hubbell F, Akin B West J Med. 1987; 147(3):321-2.

PMID: 18750310 PMC: 1025860.


Preoperative laboratory evaluation of patients aged over 40 years undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery.

Ajimura F, Maia A, Hachiya A, Watanabe A, Nunes M, Martins M Sao Paulo Med J. 2005; 123(2):50-3.

PMID: 15947829 PMC: 11052421. DOI: 10.1590/s1516-31802005000200003.


Usefulness of routine admission complete blood cell counts on a general medical service.

Frye E, Hubbell F, Akin B, Rucker L J Gen Intern Med. 1987; 2(6):373-6.

PMID: 3694295 DOI: 10.1007/BF02596360.


References
1.
. Periodic health examination: a guide for designing individualized preventive health care in the asymptomatic patients. Medical Practice Committee, American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 1981; 95(6):729-32. View

2.
Gyory A, Kesson A, Talbot J . Microscopy of urine--now you see it, now you don't!. Am Heart J. 1980; 99(4):537-8. DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(80)90391-9. View

3.
Schoen I, Brooks S . Judgment based on 95 per cent confidence limits: a statistical dilemma involving multitest screening and proficiency testing of multiple specimens. Am J Clin Pathol. 1970; 53(2):190-3. DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/53.2.190. View

4.
Robbins J, Mushlin A . Preoperative evaluation of the healthy patient. Med Clin North Am. 1979; 63(6):1145-56. DOI: 10.1016/s0025-7125(16)31632-7. View

5.
Schneiderman L, Desalvo L, Baylor S, Wolf P . The "abnormal" screening laboratory results. Its effect on physician and patient. Arch Intern Med. 1972; 129(1):88-90. View