» Articles » PMID: 37725563

Patient Recommendations for the Content and Design of Electronic Returns of Genetic Test Results: Interview Study Among Patients Who Accessed Their Genetic Test Results Via the Internet

Overview
Journal JMIRx Med
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2023 Sep 19
PMID 37725563
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Genetic test results will be increasingly made available electronically as more patient-facing tools are developed; however, little research has been done that collects data on patient preferences for content and design before creating results templates.

Objective: This study identifies patient preferences for the electronic return of genetic test results, including what considerations should be prioritized for content and design.

Methods: Following user-centered design methods, 59 interviews were conducted by using semistructured protocols. The interviews explored the content and design issues of patient portals that facilitated the return of test results to patients. We interviewed patients who received electronic results for specific types of genetics tests (pharmacogenetic tests, hereditary blood disorder tests, and tests for the risk of heritable cancers) or electronically received any type of genetic or nongenetic test results.

Results: In general, many of participants felt that there always needed to be some clinician involvement in electronic result returns and that electronic coversheets with simple summaries would be helpful for facilitating this. Coversheet summaries could accompany, but not replace, the more detailed report. Participants had specific suggestions for such results summaries, such as only reporting the information that was the most important for patients to understand, including next steps, and doing so by using clear language that is free of medical jargon. Electronic result returns should also include explicit encouragement for patients to contact health care providers about questions. Finally, many participants preferred to manage their care by using their smartphones, particularly in instances when they needed to access health information on the go.

Conclusions: Participants recommended that a patient-friendly front section should accompany the more detailed report and made suggestions for organization, content, and wording. Many used their smartphones regularly to access test results; therefore, health systems and patient portal software vendors should accommodate smartphone app design and web portal design concomitantly when developing platforms for returning results.

Citing Articles

Patient experiences with tissue-based genomic testing during active surveillance for prostate cancer.

Leapman M, Sutherland R, Gross C, Ma X, Seibert T, Cooperberg M BJUI Compass. 2024; 5(1):142-149.

PMID: 38179031 PMC: 10764160. DOI: 10.1002/bco2.277.

References
1.
Hoskovec J, Bennett R, Carey M, DaVanzo J, Dougherty M, Hahn S . Projecting the Supply and Demand for Certified Genetic Counselors: a Workforce Study. J Genet Couns. 2017; 27(1):16-20. DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0158-8. View

2.
Nystrom D, Singh H, Baldwin J, Sittig D, Giardina T . Methods for Patient-Centered Interface Design of Test Result Display in Online Portals. EGEMS (Wash DC). 2018; 6(1):15. PMC: 6078112. DOI: 10.5334/egems.255. View

3.
Leo M, McMullen C, Wilfond B, Lynch F, Reiss J, Gilmore M . Patients' ratings of genetic conditions validate a taxonomy to simplify decisions about preconception carrier screening via genome sequencing. Am J Med Genet A. 2016; 170(3):574-82. PMC: 4824299. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37477. View

4.
Amante D, Hogan T, Pagoto S, English T . A systematic review of electronic portal usage among patients with diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014; 16(11):784-93. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2014.0078. View

5.
Dendere R, Slade C, Burton-Jones A, Sullivan C, Staib A, Janda M . Patient Portals Facilitating Engagement With Inpatient Electronic Medical Records: A Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2019; 21(4):e12779. PMC: 6482406. DOI: 10.2196/12779. View