» Articles » PMID: 37725542

Measuring Integrated Novel Dimensions in Neurodevelopmental and Stress-Related Mental Disorders (MIND-SET): Protocol for a Cross-sectional Comorbidity Study From a Research Domain Criteria Perspective

Abstract

Background: It is widely acknowledged that comorbidity between psychiatric disorders is common. Shared and diverse underpinnings of psychiatric disorders cannot be systematically understood based on symptom-based categories of mental disorders, which map poorly onto pathophysiological mechanisms. In the Measuring Integrated Novel Dimensions in Neurodevelopmental and Stress-Related Mental Disorders (MIND-SET) study, we make use of current concepts of comorbidity that transcend the current diagnostic categories. We test this approach to psychiatric problems in patients with frequently occurring psychiatric disorders and their comorbidities (excluding psychosis).

Objective: The main aim of the MIND-SET project is to determine the shared and specific mechanisms of neurodevelopmental and stress-related psychiatric disorders at different observational levels.

Methods: This is an observational cross-sectional study. Data from different observational levels as defined in the Research Domain Criteria (genetics, physiology, neuropsychology, system-level neuroimaging, behavior, self-report, and experimental neurocognitive paradigms) are collected over four time points. Included are adult (aged ≥18 years), nonpsychotic, psychiatric patients with a clinical diagnosis of a stress-related disorder (mood disorder, anxiety disorder, or substance use disorder) or a neurodevelopmental disorder (autism spectrum disorder or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder). Individuals with no current or past psychiatric diagnosis are included as neurotypical controls. Data collection started in June 2016 with the aim to include a total of 650 patients and 150 neurotypical controls by 2021. The data collection procedure includes online questionnaires and three subsequent sessions with (1) standardized clinical examination, physical examination, and blood sampling; (2) psychological constructs, neuropsychological tests, and biological marker sampling; and (3) neuroimaging measures.

Results: We aim to include a total of 650 patients and 150 neurotypical control participants in the time period between 2016 and 2022. In October 2021, we are at 95% of our target.

Conclusions: The MIND-SET study enables us to investigate the mechanistic underpinnings of nonpsychotic psychiatric disorders transdiagnostically. We will identify both shared and disorder-specific markers at different observational levels that can be used as targets for future diagnostic and treatment approaches.

Citing Articles

Dissecting task-based fMRI activity using normative modelling: an application to the Emotional Face Matching Task.

Savage H, Mulders P, van Eijndhoven P, van Oort J, Tendolkar I, Vrijsen J Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):888.

PMID: 39033247 PMC: 11271583. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-06573-z.


Autistic and non-autistic individuals show the same amygdala activity during emotional face processing.

Langenbach B, Grotegerd D, Mulders P, Tendolkar I, van Oort J, Duyser F Mol Autism. 2024; 15(1):2.

PMID: 38200601 PMC: 10782610. DOI: 10.1186/s13229-024-00582-9.


Brain structure and function link to variation in biobehavioral dimensions across the psychopathological continuum.

van Oort J, Llera A, Kohn N, Mei T, Collard R, Duyser F Elife. 2023; 12.

PMID: 37334965 PMC: 10519708. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.85006.


Multi-polygenic scores in psychiatry: From disorder specific to transdiagnostic perspectives.

Shi Y, Sprooten E, Mulders P, Vrijsen J, Bralten J, Demontis D Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2023; 195(1):e32951.

PMID: 37334623 PMC: 10803201. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32951.


Striatal connectopic maps link to functional domains across psychiatric disorders.

Mulders P, van Eijndhoven P, van Oort J, Oldehinkel M, Duyser F, Kist J Transl Psychiatry. 2022; 12(1):513.

PMID: 36513630 PMC: 9747785. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-022-02273-6.


References
1.
Gusnard D, Akbudak E, Shulman G, Raichle M . Medial prefrontal cortex and self-referential mental activity: relation to a default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98(7):4259-64. PMC: 31213. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.071043098. View

2.
Tebartz van Elst L, Pick M, Biscaldi M, Fangmeier T, Riedel A . High-functioning autism spectrum disorder as a basic disorder in adult psychiatry and psychotherapy: psychopathological presentation, clinical relevance and therapeutic concepts. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2013; 263 Suppl 2:S189-96. DOI: 10.1007/s00406-013-0459-3. View

3.
Seeley W, Menon V, Schatzberg A, Keller J, Glover G, Kenna H . Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. J Neurosci. 2007; 27(9):2349-56. PMC: 2680293. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5587-06.2007. View

4.
den Ouden H, Daw N, Fernandez G, Elshout J, Rijpkema M, Hoogman M . Dissociable effects of dopamine and serotonin on reversal learning. Neuron. 2013; 80(4):1090-100. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.08.030. View

5.
Swainson R, Rogers R, Sahakian B, Summers B, Polkey C, Robbins T . Probabilistic learning and reversal deficits in patients with Parkinson's disease or frontal or temporal lobe lesions: possible adverse effects of dopaminergic medication. Neuropsychologia. 2000; 38(5):596-612. DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(99)00103-7. View