Publication Retraction in Spine Surgery: a Systematic Review

Overview

Journal Eur Spine J

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2023 Sep 19

PMID 37725162

Authors

Jordan J Levett

Lior M Elkaim

Naif M Alotaibi

Michael H Weber

Nicolas Dea

Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: The number of articles retracted by peer-reviewed journals has increased in recent years. This study systematically reviews retracted publications in the spine surgery literature.

Methods: A search of PubMed MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Retraction Watch, and the independent websites of 15 spine surgery-related journals from inception to September of 2022 was performed without language restrictions. PRISMA guidelines were followed with title/abstract screening, and full-text screening was conducted independently and in duplicate by two reviewers. Study characteristics and bibliometric information for each publication was extracted.

Results: Of 250 studies collected from the search, 65 met the inclusion criteria. The most common reason for retraction was data error (n = 15, 21.13%), followed by plagiarism (n = 14, 19.72%) and submission to another journal (n = 14, 19.72%). Most studies pertained to degenerative pathologies of the spine (n = 32, 80.00%). Most articles had no indication of retraction in their manuscript (n = 24, 36.92%), while others had a watermark or notice at the beginning of the article. The median number of citations per retracted publication was 10.0 (IQR 3-29), and the median 4-year impact factor of the journals was 5.05 (IQR 3.20-6.50). On multivariable linear regression, the difference in years from publication to retraction (p = 0.0343, β = 6.56, 95% CI 0.50-12.62) and the journal 4-year impact factor (p = 0.0029, β = 7.47, 95% CI 2.66-12.28) were positively associated with the total number of citations per retracted publication. Most articles originated from China (n = 30, 46.15%) followed by the United States (n = 12, 18.46%) and Germany (n = 3, 4.62%). The most common study design was retrospective cohort studies (n = 14, 21.54%).

Conclusions: The retraction of publications has increased in recent years in spine surgery. Researchers consulting this body of literature should remain vigilant. Institutions and journals should collaborate to increase publication transparency and scientific integrity.

Citing Articles

A systematic analysis of temporal trends, characteristics, and citations of retracted stem cell publications.

Song F, Wu B, Wei G, Cheng S, Wei L, Xiong W BMC Med. 2025; 23(1):131.

PMID: 40022137 PMC: 11871751. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-025-03965-8.

References

Bolland M, Grey A, Avenell A . Citation of retracted publications: A challenging problem. Account Res. 2021; 29(1):18-25. DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2021.1886933. View

Fang F, Casadevall A . Retracted science and the retraction index. Infect Immun. 2011; 79(10):3855-9. PMC: 3187237. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.05661-11. View

Gupta A . Fraud and misconduct in clinical research: A concern. Perspect Clin Res. 2013; 4(2):144-7. PMC: 3700330. DOI: 10.4103/2229-3485.111800. View

Wager E, Barbour V, Yentis S, Kleinert S . Retractions: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics. J Crit Care. 2009; 24(4):620-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.10.009. View

Gaudino M, Robinson N, Audisio K, Rahouma M, Benedetto U, Kurlansky P . Trends and Characteristics of Retracted Articles in the Biomedical Literature, 1971 to 2020. JAMA Intern Med. 2021; 181(8):1118-1121. PMC: 8111562. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.1807. View

Budd J, Sievert M, Schultz T . Phenomena of retraction: reasons for retraction and citations to the publications. JAMA. 1998; 280(3):296-7. DOI: 10.1001/jama.280.3.296. View

Wager E, Williams P . Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008. J Med Ethics. 2011; 37(9):567-70. DOI: 10.1136/jme.2010.040964. View

Wang J, Ku J, Alotaibi N, Rutka J . Retraction of Neurosurgical Publications: A Systematic Review. World Neurosurg. 2017; 103:809-814.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.014. View

Madhugiri V, Nagella A, Mohan Uppar A . An analysis of retractions in neurosurgery and allied clinical and basic science specialties. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020; 163(1):19-30. PMC: 7562691. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-020-04615-z. View

10.

Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71. PMC: 8005924. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71. View

11.

Liu Y, Qi Y, Diaty D, Zheng G, Shen X, Lin S . Treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis secondary to ligamentum flavum hypertrophy using percutaneous endoscopy through interlaminar approach: a retrospective study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020; 15(1):337. PMC: 7437061. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01874-5. View

12.

Chauvin A, de Villelongue C, Pateron D, Yordanov Y . A systematic review of retracted publications in emergency medicine. Eur J Emerg Med. 2017; 26(1):19-23. DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000491. View

13.

Bennett C, Chambers L, Al-Hafez L, Michener C, Falcone T, Yao M . Retracted articles in the obstetrics literature: lessons from the past to change the future. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020; 2(4):100201. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100201. View

14.

Berlin N, Yost M, Cheng B, Henderson J, Kerr E, Nathan H . Patterns and Determinants of Low-Value Preoperative Testing in Michigan. JAMA Intern Med. 2021; 181(8):1115-1118. PMC: 8129898. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.1653. View

15.

Steen R . Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?. J Med Ethics. 2010; 37(4):249-53. DOI: 10.1136/jme.2010.040923. View

16.

Hobbenaghi R, Javanbakht J, Hosseini E, Mohammadi S, Rajabian M, Moayeri P . Retraction Note: Neuropathological and neuroprotective features of vitamin B on the dorsal spinal ganglion of rats after the experimental crush of sciatic nerve: an experimental study. Diagn Pathol. 2016; 11(1):109. PMC: 5090878. DOI: 10.1186/s13000-016-0578-z. View

17.

Riesmeier A, Schellhaass A, Boldt J, Suttner S . Crystalloid/colloid versus crystalloid intravascular volume administration before spinal anesthesia in elderly patients: the influence on cardiac output and stroke volume. Anesth Analg. 2009; 108(2):650-4. DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181923722. View

18.

Adogwa O, Vuong V, Lilly D, Desai S, Khanna R, Ahmad S . Retraction: Limited post-operative dexamethasone use does not affect lumbar fusion: a single institutional experience. J Spine Surg. 2019; 5(1):183. PMC: 6465465. DOI: 10.21037/jss.2019.03.03. View

19.

Reuben S, Buvanendran A, Kroin J, Raghunathan K . The analgesic efficacy of celecoxib, pregabalin, and their combination for spinal fusion surgery. Anesth Analg. 2006; 103(5):1271-7. DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000237279.08847.2d. View

20.

Reuben S, Ekman E, Raghunathan K, Steinberg R, Blinder J, Adesioye J . The effect of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition on acute and chronic donor-site pain after spinal-fusion surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006; 31(1):6-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.rapm.2005.10.014. View