» Articles » PMID: 37720969

Cerebral Embolic Protection During Transcatheter Heart Interventions

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Stroke remains a devastating complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), with the incidence of clinically apparent stroke seemingly fixed at around 3% despite TAVR's significant evolution during the past decade. Embolic showers of debris (calcium, atheroma, valve material, foreign material) are captured in the majority of patients who have TAVR using a filter-based cerebral embolic protection device (CEPD). Additionally, in systematic brain imaging studies, the majority of patients receiving TAVR exhibit new cerebral lesions. Mechanistic studies have shown reductions in the volume of new cerebral lesions using CEPDs, yet the first randomised trial powered for periprocedural stroke within 72 hours of a transfemoral TAVR failed to meet its primary endpoint of showing superiority of the SENTINEL CEPD. The present review summarises the clinicopathological rationale for the development of CEPDs, the evidence behind these devices to date and the emerging recognition of cerebral embolisation in many non-TAVR transcatheter procedures. Given the uniqueness of each of the various CEPDs under development, specific trials tailored to their designs will need to be undertaken to broaden the CEPD field, in addition to evaluating the role of CEPD in non-TAVR transcatheter heart interventions. Importantly, the cost-effectiveness of these devices will require assessment to broaden the adoption of CEPDs globally.

Citing Articles

Early Outcomes With Cerebral Embolic Protection During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

Shekhar S, Krishnaswamy A, Reed G, Yun J, Puri R, Kapadia S Struct Heart. 2025; 9(1):100353.

PMID: 40017830 PMC: 11864126. DOI: 10.1016/j.shj.2024.100353.


Neuroprotection Devices in Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories: Does It Sufficiently Protect Our Patients?.

Tan C, Higgins M, Thanabalasingam V, Sella Kapu C, Zhang Z Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 61(2).

PMID: 40005422 PMC: 11857601. DOI: 10.3390/medicina61020305.


Cerebral Embolic Protection: Is There a Benefit for Left Atrial and Mitral Valve Procedures?.

Besir B, Kapadia S Curr Cardiol Rep. 2024; 26(12):1341-1346.

PMID: 39373959 PMC: 11668839. DOI: 10.1007/s11886-024-02132-4.


Cerebral Embolic Protection Devices: Are There Any Indications in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement?.

Sayah N, Skalidis I, Mesnier J, Neylon A, Akodad M, Asgar A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(18).

PMID: 39336957 PMC: 11432207. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13185471.


A Comprehensive Review of Percutaneous and Surgical Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.

Swieczkowski M, Dabrowski E, Muszynski P, Pogorzelski P, Jemielita P, Dudzik J J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024; 11(8).

PMID: 39195142 PMC: 11354510. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd11080234.


References
1.
Reddy V, Neuzil P, De Potter T, van der Heyden J, Tromp S, Rensing B . Permanent Percutaneous Carotid Artery Filter to Prevent Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: The CAPTURE Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 74(7):829-839. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.035. View

2.
Ryomoto M, Tanaka H, Kajiyama T, Mitsuno M, Yamamura M, Fukui S . Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair with Mini-Cardiopulmonary Bypass to Prevent Stroke. Ann Vasc Surg. 2016; 36:320-324. DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.03.010. View

3.
Ghanem A, Kocurek J, Sinning J, Wagner M, Becker B, Vogel M . Cognitive trajectory after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013; 6(6):615-24. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.000429. View

4.
Dona C, Koschutnik M, Nitsche C, Winter M, Seidl V, Siller-Matula J . Cerebral Protection in TAVR-Can We Do Without? A Real-World All-Comer Intention-to-Treat Study-Impact on Stroke Rate, Length of Hospital Stay, and Twelve-Month Mortality. J Pers Med. 2022; 12(2). PMC: 8878932. DOI: 10.3390/jpm12020320. View

5.
Grover G, Perera A, Hamady M, Rudarakanchana N, Barras C, Singh A . Cerebral embolic protection in thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2018; 68(6):1656-1666. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.11.098. View