» Articles » PMID: 37719058

BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations and Their Clinical Relevance in Selected Women Diagnosed with Triple-negative Breast Cancer in Kenya: a Descriptive Cross-sectional Study

Overview
Journal Pan Afr Med J
Date 2023 Sep 18
PMID 37719058
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous breast cancer type with a poor prognosis. About 25% of TNBC patients carry breast cancer susceptibility genes 1 and 2 (BRCA1 and BRCA2) mutations. Screening for BRCA mutations would facilitate early detection and initiation of personalized therapy, thus improving prognosis. However, this has not been explored in our population. We aimed at identifying BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations and their clinical relevance among selected women with TNBC in Kenya.

Methods: six participants enrolled in a larger descriptive cross-sectional study who met the inclusion criteria were selected. Structured questionnaires were used to obtain qualitative data. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was extracted from saliva. Whole exome sequencing of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes using a next-generation sequencer was done.

Results: overall, 83.3% of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations with clinical relevance were detected. Most of the variants (63%) were found in BRCA1 whereas 37% were found in BRCA2. Pathogenic mutations in BRCA1 gene included c.5513T>A, c.5291T>C, c.5297T>G, c.110C>A, c.5212G>C, c.122A>C, c.5117G>A, c.5095C>T, c.5054C>T, c.5053A>G, c.115T>A, c.5143A>G, and c.130T>G. Those in BRCA2 gene were c.7878G>A, c.9154C>T, c.8243G>A, c.7976G>A, c.8165C>G, c.8167G>C, and c.8168A>T. One variant (c.5352delG: p. Leu1785Terfs) not matching any in the BRCA Exchange and ClinVar databases was detected.

Conclusion: our study revealed BRCA mutations that could be common among our population. Further, it has shown that BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic mutations identified are of clinical relevance and there is a need to screen for these mutations in breast cancer patients to understand their implication in patient management outcomes.

References
1.
Colombo M, De Vecchi G, Caleca L, Foglia C, Ripamonti C, Ficarazzi F . Comparative in vitro and in silico analyses of variants in splicing regions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes and characterization of novel pathogenic mutations. PLoS One. 2013; 8(2):e57173. PMC: 3579815. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057173. View

2.
Mavaddat N, Antoniou A, Easton D, Garcia-Closas M . Genetic susceptibility to breast cancer. Mol Oncol. 2010; 4(3):174-91. PMC: 5527934. DOI: 10.1016/j.molonc.2010.04.011. View

3.
Colditz G, Kaphingst K, Hankinson S, Rosner B . Family history and risk of breast cancer: nurses' health study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012; 133(3):1097-104. PMC: 3387322. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-1985-9. View

4.
Evans O, Gaba F, Manchanda R . Population-based genetic testing for Women's cancer prevention. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020; 65:139-153. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.02.007. View

5.
Imyanitov E, Sokolenko A . Mechanisms of acquired resistance of BRCA1/2-driven tumors to platinum compounds and PARP inhibitors. World J Clin Oncol. 2021; 12(7):544-556. PMC: 8317650. DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i7.544. View