» Articles » PMID: 37716932

Learning Curve for Thoracoscopic Individual Basilar Segmentectomy: 18-Year Experience

Overview
Journal World J Surg
Publisher Wiley
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2023 Sep 16
PMID 37716932
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Thoracoscopic anatomical individual basilar segmentectomy remains challenging owing to the deep intraparenchymal location of the hilar structures and anatomical variations. We analyzed and reported the experience and progress of thoracoscopic anatomical individual basilar segmentectomy at our university hospital.

Methods: We retrospectively examined the patients who underwent anatomical basilar segmentectomy at our institution from January 2004 to December 2021. We divided our analysis period into two parts: the first period (2004-2012) was the introductory period of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) segmentectomy, and the second period (2013-2021) was the maturity period of VATS segmentectomy. The learning curve of the leading surgeon in the second period was also evaluated based on the operative time and cumulative sum value of the operative time.

Results: Overall, 127 cases were evaluated, among whom 33 and 94 cases were assessed during the introductory and maturity periods of thoracoscopic segmentectomy, respectively. Age (P = 0.003) and Charlson comorbidity index (P = 0.002) were higher in the second period than in the first period. Use of a uniport (P = 0.006) was higher, and postoperative hospitalization duration (P =  < 0.001) and operative time (P = 0.024) were shorter in the second period than in the first period. A learning curve obtained during the maturity period showed: The inflection point for the learning curve of thoracoscopic basilar segmentectomy was reached after 42 cases.

Conclusions: We have demonstrated a single institution's progress and learning curve for difficult segmentectomies. This may be helpful to institutions considering performing this surgery.

Citing Articles

Surgical outcomes and learning curve of complex versus simple segmentectomy for uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: an initial experience of 100 cases of a single experienced surgeon.

Homma T, Saji H, Shimada Y, Tanabe K, Kojima K, Marushima H J Thorac Dis. 2024; 16(11):7361-7371.

PMID: 39678892 PMC: 11635227. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-24-1028.

References
1.
Okada M, Koike T, Higashiyama M, Yamato Y, Kodama K, Tsubota N . Radical sublobar resection for small-sized non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006; 132(4):769-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.02.063. View

2.
Subramanian M, McMurry T, Meyers B, Puri V, Kozower B . Long-Term Results for Clinical Stage IA Lung Cancer: Comparing Lobectomy and Sublobar Resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018; 106(2):375-381. PMC: 6375491. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.02.049. View

3.
Kodama K, Higashiyama M, Okami J, Tokunaga T, Imamura F, Nakayama T . Oncologic Outcomes of Segmentectomy Versus Lobectomy for Clinical T1a N0 M0 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015; 101(2):504-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.08.063. View

4.
Dziedzic R, Zurek W, Marjanski T, Rudzinski P, Orlowski T, Sawicka W . Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: long-term results of lobectomy versus sublobar resection from the Polish National Lung Cancer Registry. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017; 52(2):363-369. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx092. View

5.
Schuchert M, Pettiford B, Keeley S, dAmato T, Kilic A, Close J . Anatomic segmentectomy in the treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007; 84(3):926-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.05.007. View