» Articles » PMID: 37714675

Analysis and Comparison of Clinical Practice Guidelines Regarding Treatment Recommendations for Chronic Tinnitus in Adults: a Systematic Review

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 Sep 15
PMID 37714675
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To determine if, and to what extent, published clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of chronic tinnitus vary in their recommendations.

Design: Systematic review of guidelines.

Data Sources: PubMed, EMBASE and GIN electronic databases were searched in March 2022 and the search was updated in June 2023.

Eligibility Criteria: We included clinical practice guidelines that gave recommendations on the treatment of tinnitus. No language restrictions were applied.

Data Extraction And Synthesis: Two independent reviewers extracted the data and used the AGREE checklist to report on reporting.

Results: A total of 10 guidelines were identified and included, published between 2011 and 2021. Recommendations for 13 types of tinnitus treatments were compared. Large differences in guideline development and methodology were found. Seven of the 10 guidelines included a systematic search of the literature to identify the available evidence. Six of the 10 guidelines used a framework for the development of the guideline. Reporting was poor in multiple guidelines. Counselling and cognitive behavioural therapy were the only treatments that were recommended for treating tinnitus associated distress by all guidelines that reported on these topics. Tinnitus retraining therapy, sound therapy, hearing aids and cochlear implantation were not unanimously recommended either due to the lack of evidence, a high risk of bias or judgement of no beneficial effect of the specific treatment.

Conclusions: There were notable differences with respect to whether guidelines considered the available evidence sufficient enough to make a recommendation. Notably, we identified substantial differences in the rigour of guideline design and development. Reporting was poor in many guidelines. Future guidelines could benefit from the use of reporting tools to improve reporting and transparency and the inclusion of guideline experts and patients to improve the quality of clinical practice guidelines on tinnitus.

Citing Articles

Frontal gamma-alpha ratio reveals neural oscillatory mechanism of attention shifting in tinnitus.

Feng X, Bao X, Huang H, Wang Z, Hu W, Xue C iScience. 2025; 28(3):111929.

PMID: 40040811 PMC: 11879603. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.111929.


Continuous Improvement of Chronic Tinnitus Through a 9-Month Smartphone-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Walter U, Pennig S, Bleckmann L, Roschmann-Doose K, Wittig T, Thomsen J J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e59575.

PMID: 39965780 PMC: 11888023. DOI: 10.2196/59575.


The Current State of Tinnitus Diagnosis and Treatment: a Multidisciplinary Expert Perspective.

Kleinjung T, Peter N, Schecklmann M, Langguth B J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2024; 25(5):413-425.

PMID: 39138756 PMC: 11528090. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-024-00960-3.


Easing the Burden of Tinnitus: A Narrative Review for Exploring Effective Pharmacological Strategies.

Kim S, Kim I, Kim H Cureus. 2024; 16(2):e54861.

PMID: 38533154 PMC: 10964395. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.54861.

References
1.
Shekelle P, Woolf S, Eccles M, Grimshaw J . Clinical guidelines: developing guidelines. BMJ. 1999; 318(7183):593-6. PMC: 1115034. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.318.7183.593. View

2.
Traversy G, Barnieh L, Akl E, Allan G, Brouwers M, Ganache I . Managing conflicts of interest in the development of health guidelines. CMAJ. 2021; 193(2):E49-E54. PMC: 7773042. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.200651. View

3.
Tunkel D, Bauer C, Sun G, Rosenfeld R, Chandrasekhar S, Cunningham Jr E . Clinical practice guideline: tinnitus. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014; 151(2 Suppl):S1-S40. DOI: 10.1177/0194599814545325. View

4.
Husain F, Gander P, Jansen J, Shen S . Expectations for Tinnitus Treatment and Outcomes: A Survey Study of Audiologists and Patients. J Am Acad Audiol. 2018; 29(4):313-336. DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.16154. View

5.
Piso B, Reinsperger I, Winkler R . Recommendations from international clinical guidelines for routine antenatal infection screening: does evidence matter?. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2014; 12(1):50-61. DOI: 10.1097/01.XEB.0000444636.80841.c9. View