» Articles » PMID: 37713468

Glioma Genetic Profiles Associated with Electrophysiologic Hyperexcitability

Overview
Journal Neuro Oncol
Specialties Neurology
Oncology
Date 2023 Sep 15
PMID 37713468
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Distinct genetic alterations determine glioma aggressiveness, however, the diversity of somatic mutations contributing to peritumoral hyperexcitability and seizures over the course of the disease is uncertain. This study aimed to identify tumor somatic mutation profiles associated with clinically significant hyperexcitability.

Methods: A single center cohort of adults with WHO grades 1-4 glioma and targeted exome sequencing (n = 1716) was analyzed and cross-referenced with a validated EEG database to identify the subset of individuals who underwent continuous EEG monitoring (n = 206). Hyperexcitability was defined by the presence of lateralized periodic discharges and/or electrographic seizures. Cross-validated discriminant analysis models trained exclusively on recurrent somatic mutations were used to identify variants associated with hyperexcitability.

Results: The distribution of WHO grades and tumor mutational burdens were similar between patients with and without hyperexcitability. Discriminant analysis models classified the presence or absence of EEG hyperexcitability with an overall accuracy of 70.9%, regardless of IDH1 R132H inclusion. Predictive variants included nonsense mutations in ATRX and TP53, indel mutations in RBBP8 and CREBBP, and nonsynonymous missense mutations with predicted damaging consequences in EGFR, KRAS, PIK3CA, TP53, and USP28. This profile improved estimates of hyperexcitability in a multivariate analysis controlling for age, sex, tumor location, integrated pathologic diagnosis, recurrence status, and preoperative epilepsy. Predicted somatic mutation variants were over-represented in patients with hyperexcitability compared to individuals without hyperexcitability and those who did not undergo continuous EEG.

Conclusion: These findings implicate diverse glioma somatic mutations in cancer genes associated with peritumoral hyperexcitability. Tumor genetic profiling may facilitate glioma-related epilepsy prognostication and management.

Citing Articles

Development of a novel calculator to predict gonadotropin dose and oocyte yield in oocyte cryopreservation cycles.

Yilmaz B, Bakkensen J, Yeh C, Muhammad L, Feinberg E J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025; 42(2):423-432.

PMID: 39775731 PMC: 11871197. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03372-7.


Pilot Trial of Perampanel on Peritumoral Hyperexcitability in Newly Diagnosed High-grade Glioma.

Tobochnik S, Regan M, Dorotan M, Reich D, Lapinskas E, Hossain M Clin Cancer Res. 2024; 30(23):5365-5373.

PMID: 39499201 PMC: 11611619. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-1849.


Pilot trial of perampanel on peritumoral hyperexcitability and clinical outcomes in newly diagnosed high-grade glioma.

Tobochnik S, Regan M, Dorotan M, Reich D, Lapinskas E, Hossain M medRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38645003 PMC: 11030478. DOI: 10.1101/2024.04.11.24305666.


A phase Ib/II randomized, open-label drug repurposing trial of glutamate signaling inhibitors in combination with chemoradiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: the GLUGLIO trial protocol.

Mastall M, Roth P, Bink A, Maranta A, Laubli H, Hottinger A BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):82.

PMID: 38225589 PMC: 10789019. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11797-z.


Differential metabolic alterations in IDH1 mutant vs. wildtype glioma cells promote epileptogenesis through distinctive mechanisms.

McAfee D, Moyer M, Queen J, Mortazavi A, Boddeti U, Bachani M Front Cell Neurosci. 2023; 17:1288918.

PMID: 38026690 PMC: 10680369. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2023.1288918.

References
1.
Menke L, Gardeitchik T, Hammond P, Heimdal K, Houge G, Hufnagel S . Further delineation of an entity caused by CREBBP and EP300 mutations but not resembling Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2018; 176(4):862-876. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.38626. View

2.
Huberfeld G, Vecht C . Seizures and gliomas--towards a single therapeutic approach. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016; 12(4):204-16. DOI: 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.26. View

3.
Shihab H, Gough J, Cooper D, Stenson P, Barker G, Edwards K . Predicting the functional, molecular, and phenotypic consequences of amino acid substitutions using hidden Markov models. Hum Mutat. 2012; 34(1):57-65. PMC: 3558800. DOI: 10.1002/humu.22225. View

4.
Venkataramani V, Tanev D, Strahle C, Studier-Fischer A, Fankhauser L, Kessler T . Glutamatergic synaptic input to glioma cells drives brain tumour progression. Nature. 2019; 573(7775):532-538. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1564-x. View

5.
Tobochnik S, Pisano W, Lapinskas E, Ligon K, Lee J . Effect of PIK3CA variants on glioma-related epilepsy and response to treatment. Epilepsy Res. 2021; 175:106681. PMC: 8277701. DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2021.106681. View