» Articles » PMID: 37713046

Prognostic Model of ER-positive, HER2-negative Breast Cancer Predicted by Clinically Relevant Indicators

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2023 Sep 15
PMID 37713046
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To study the clinicopathological variables connected with disease-free survival (DFS) as well as overall survival (OS) in patients who are ER-positive or HER2-negative and to propose nomograms for predicting individual risk.

Methods: In this investigation, we examined 585 (development cohort) and 291 (external validation) ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer patients from January 2010 to January 2014. From January 2010 to December 2014, we retrospectively reviewed and analyzed 291 (external validation) and 585 (development cohort) HER2-negative, ER-positive breast cancer patients. Cox regression analysis, both multivariate and univariate, confirmed the independence indicators for OS and DFS.

Results: Using cox regression analysis, both multivariate and univariate, the following variables were combined to predict the DFS of development cohort: pathological stage (HR = 1.391; 95% CI = 1.043-1.855; P value = 0.025), luminal parting (HR = 1.836; 95% CI = 1.142-2.952; P value = .012), and clinical stage (HR = 1.879; 95% CI = 1.102-3.203; P value = 0.021). Endocrine therapy (HR = 3.655; 95% CI = 1.084-12.324; P value = 0.037) and clinical stage (HR = 6.792; 95% CI = 1.672-28.345; P value = 0.009) were chosen as predictors of OS. Furthermore, we generated RS-OS and RS-DFS. According to the findings of Kaplan-Meier curves, patients who are classified as having a low risk have considerably longer DFS and OS durations than patients who are classified as having a high risk.

Conclusion: To generate nomograms that predicted DFS and OS, independent predictors of DFS in ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer patients were chosen. The nomograms successfully stratified patients into prognostic categories and worked well in both internal validation and external validation.

Citing Articles

Identification of a Potential PGK1 Inhibitor with the Suppression of Breast Cancer Cells Using Virtual Screening and Molecular Docking.

Chen X, Zuo Z, Li X, Li Q, Zhang L Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025; 17(12.

PMID: 39770478 PMC: 11676932. DOI: 10.3390/ph17121636.

References
1.
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel R, Torre L, Jemal A . Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68(6):394-424. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21492. View

2.
Fan S, Yang Z, Ke Z, Huang K, Liu N, Fang X . Downregulation of the long non-coding RNA TUG1 is associated with cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in breast cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017; 95:1636-1643. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.09.076. View

3.
Johnston S . Clinical efforts to combine endocrine agents with targeted therapies against epidermal growth factor receptor/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and mammalian target of rapamycin in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2006; 12(3 Pt 2):1061s-1068s. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2125. View

4.
Cardoso F, Harbeck N, Fallowfield L, Kyriakides S, Senkus E . Locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2012; 23 Suppl 7:vii11-9. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds232. View

5.
Wang Y, Li J, Xia Y, Gong R, Wang K, Yan Z . Prognostic nomogram for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after partial hepatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31(9):1188-95. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.41.5984. View