» Articles » PMID: 37712984

Oral Health Conditions in Patients Under Antiresorptive Therapy Are Comparable to Unexposed During Supportive Periodontal Care

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2023 Sep 15
PMID 37712984
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To investigate oral health and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of patients under antiresorptive therapy (ART) during supportive periodontal care (SPC) considering history of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ).

Materials And Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 100 patients (50 receiving ART (exposed) and 50 without ART (unexposed)) in regular SPC were enrolled for a clinical oral examination and the evaluation of OHRQoL using the OHIP-G14-questionnaire. History of MRONJ was assessed by anamnesis and reviewing patient records.

Results: There were no statistically significant group differences in age (exposed: 70.00 ± 9.07 versus unexposed: 71.02 ± 8.22 years), sex, distribution of systemic diseases and duration of SPC (on average 8.61 ± 5.73 years). Number of teeth (21.02 ± 5.84 versus 21.40 ± 5.42), DMFT (18.38 ± 3.85 versus 17.96 ± 4.08), probing pocket depth (2.31 ± 0.20 versus 2.38 ± 0.26), clinical attachment level (3.25 ± 0.76 versus 3.46 ± 0.58) and bleeding on probing (15.07 ± 11.53 versus 15.77 ± 13.08) were also not significantly different. The OHIP-G14 sum-score was significantly higher in exposed participants (6.10 ± 6.76 versus 3.62 ± 5.22, p = 0.043). History of MRONJ was prevalent in 8% of patients under ART. Periodontal/peri-implant-related MRONJ were reported in three participants with cancer (n = 1 before and n = 2 after active periodontal therapy). History of MRONJ due to endodontic/restorative reasons was reported in one patient with osteoporosis.

Conclusions: Patients under ART in SPC demonstrated similar clinical periodontal and dental status but lower OHRQoL compared to unexposed (not statistically significant). Patient awareness of the MRONJ-risk and appropriate preventive measures should be ensured.

Clinical Relevance: SPC in osteoporotic patients under ART appeared safe regarding MRONJ, but further investigations on the MRONJ-risk in patients with different risk-profiles are necessary.

Study Registration: clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT04192188).

References
1.
Mhaskar R, Kumar A, Miladinovic B, Djulbegovic B . Bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma: an updated network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 12:CD003188. PMC: 6486151. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003188.pub4. View

2.
Zhou J, Ma X, Wang T, Zhai S . Comparative efficacy of bisphosphonates in short-term fracture prevention for primary osteoporosis: a systematic review with network meta-analyses. Osteoporos Int. 2016; 27(11):3289-3300. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-016-3654-z. View

3.
OCarrigan B, Wong M, Willson M, Stockler M, Pavlakis N, Goodwin A . Bisphosphonates and other bone agents for breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 10:CD003474. PMC: 6485886. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003474.pub4. View

4.
Major P, Lortholary A, Hon J, Abdi E, Mills G, Menssen H . Zoledronic acid is superior to pamidronate in the treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy: a pooled analysis of two randomized, controlled clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19(2):558-67. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.2.558. View

5.
Baron R, Ferrari S, Russell R . Denosumab and bisphosphonates: different mechanisms of action and effects. Bone. 2010; 48(4):677-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.11.020. View