» Articles » PMID: 37712111

A Cross-Sectional Survey on Oral Nicotine Pouches: Characterizing Use-Motives, Topography, Dependence Levels, and Adverse Events

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2023 Sep 15
PMID 37712111
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Oral nicotine pouches (ONPs) contain a crystalized nicotine powder instead of tobacco leaves. ONPs come in a variety of flavors and are often marketed as "tobacco-free," but research on ONP use-motivations and related experiences is limited.

Aims And Methods: This cross-sectional web-based survey collected self-report data on ONP use-characteristics (eg, frequency), brands and flavors used, use-motivations, dependence (Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence-Smokeless Tobacco [FTND-ST]), and ONP-related adverse events (AEs) experienced.

Results: The sample included 118 adults who reported current (past 30-day) ONP use. On average (SD), participants reported ONP use on 13 (6) days during the past month. Most participants (% of the sample) also reported the use of tobacco cigarettes (74%) and/or electronic cigarettes (53%) during the past month. Zyn (27%) and Lucy (19%) were the most currently used ONP brands with mint (23%) and tobacco (16%) as the most currently used flavors. The availability of preferred flavors was the most frequently reported (31%) ONP use-motivation. The sample demonstrated significant dependence levels (FTND-ST = 7, SD = 2). Reported AEs included mouth lesions (48%), upset stomach (39%), sore mouth (37%), sore throat (21%), and nausea (9%). Results should be interpreted in the context of study limitations, including using a relatively small and homogeneous online convenience sample. Acknowledging the limitations, this sample was deemed appropriate to include considering the novelty of the findings, the dearth of related research, and the necessity of examining foundational ONP use-characteristics (eg, topography, AEs); however, future research should consider recruiting larger and more generalizable samples.

Conclusions: The availability of preferred flavors was a key ONP use-motivation in this sample. Mint and tobacco were the most currently used flavors, with Zyn and Lucy being the most currently used ONP brands. Participants reported dependence and a substantial number of ONP-related AEs. Nationally representative surveys should investigate ONP use along with outcomes included in the current study (eg, AEs) to inform ONP surveillance and policy development efforts.

Implications: This study is among the first to assess reasons for initiating/maintaining ONP use as well as other relevant use-experiences (eg, AEs, dependence). These results highlight the role of flavors and nicotine dependence in ONP use, which are important considerations for informing ONP regulations.

Citing Articles

Effect of fruit and mint flavored Rogue oral nicotine product use on smoking reduction and quitting in a 6-Month prospective cohort of adults who smoke cigarettes.

McDowell E, Kennedy J, Feehan M, Bell S, Marking S, Zdinak J BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):3249.

PMID: 39578809 PMC: 11583794. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20463-3.


Oral mucosal changes caused by nicotine pouches: case series.

Miluna-Meldere S, Vanka S, Skadins I, Kroica J, Sperga M, Rostoka D Diagn Pathol. 2024; 19(1):127.

PMID: 39300504 PMC: 11412064. DOI: 10.1186/s13000-024-01549-3.


What is the impact of nicotine pouches on oral health: a systematic review.

Rungraungrayabkul D, Gaewkhiew P, Vichayanrat T, Shrestha B, Buajeeb W BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):889.

PMID: 39097712 PMC: 11297755. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04598-8.


Snus Use in Adolescents: A Threat to Oral Health.

Nemeth O, Sipos L, Matrai P, Szathmari-Meszaros N, Ivanyi D, Simon F J Clin Med. 2024; 13(14).

PMID: 39064277 PMC: 11277688. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13144235.

References
1.
Tosakoon S, Romm K, Berg C . Nicotine pouch awareness, use and perceptions among young adults from six metropolitan statistical areas in the United States. Tob Prev Cessat. 2023; 9:19. PMC: 10246475. DOI: 10.18332/tpc/163243. View

2.
von Elm E, Altman D, Egger M, Pocock S, Gotzsche P, Vandenbroucke J . The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007; 370(9596):1453-7. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X. View

3.
Felicione N, Ozga-Hess J, Ferguson S, Dino G, Kuhn S, Haliwa I . Cigarette smokers' concurrent use of smokeless tobacco: dual use patterns and nicotine exposure. Tob Control. 2020; 30(1):24-29. PMC: 7423753. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055345. View

4.
Duren M, Atella L, Welding K, Kennedy R . Nicotine pouches: a summary of regulatory approaches across 67 countries. Tob Control. 2023; . DOI: 10.1136/tc-2022-057734. View

5.
Heatherton T, Kozlowski L, Frecker R, Fagerstrom K . The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict. 1991; 86(9):1119-27. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01879.x. View