» Articles » PMID: 37711546

The Biological Principles and Advanced Applications of DSB Repair in CRISPR-mediated Yeast Genome Editing

Overview
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2023 Sep 15
PMID 37711546
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To improve the performance of yeast cell factories for industrial production, extensive CRISPR-mediated genome editing systems have been applied by artificially creating double-strand breaks (DSBs) to introduce mutations with the assistance of intracellular DSB repair. Diverse strategies of DSB repair are required to meet various demands, including precise editing or random editing with customized gRNAs or a gRNA library. Although most yeasts remodeling techniques have shown rewarding performance in laboratory verification, industrial yeast strain manipulation relies only on very limited strategies. Here, we comprehensively reviewed the molecular mechanisms underlying recent industrial applications to provide new insights into DSB cleavage and repair pathways in both and other unconventional yeast species. The discussion of DSB repair covers the most frequently used homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) strategies to the less well-studied illegitimate recombination (IR) pathways, such as single-strand annealing (SSA) and microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ). Various CRISPR-based genome editing tools and corresponding gene editing efficiencies are described. Finally, we summarize recently developed CRISPR-based strategies that use optimized DSB repair for genome-scale editing, providing a direction for further development of yeast genome editing.

Citing Articles

A comparative evaluation of CRISPR-Cas9 allele editing systems in : challenging research in a challenging bug.

Sofras D, Carolus H, Subotic A, Romero C, Ennis C, Hernday A bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39829791 PMC: 11741338. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.09.632232.


CRISPR/Cas9 improves targeted knock-in efficiency in .

Todokoro T, Hata Y, Ishida H Biotechnol Notes. 2024; 5:58-63.

PMID: 39416697 PMC: 11446390. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotno.2024.03.002.

References
1.
Sakuma T, Takenaga M, Kawabe Y, Nakamura T, Kamihira M, Yamamoto T . Homologous Recombination-Independent Large Gene Cassette Knock-in in CHO Cells Using TALEN and MMEJ-Directed Donor Plasmids. Int J Mol Sci. 2015; 16(10):23849-66. PMC: 4632728. DOI: 10.3390/ijms161023849. View

2.
Yarimizu T, Nonklang S, Nakamura J, Tokuda S, Nakagawa T, Lorreungsil S . Identification of auxotrophic mutants of the yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus by non-homologous end joining-mediated integrative transformation with genes from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 2013; 30(12):485-500. DOI: 10.1002/yea.2985. View

3.
Horwitz A, Walter J, Schubert M, Kung S, Hawkins K, Platt D . Efficient Multiplexed Integration of Synergistic Alleles and Metabolic Pathways in Yeasts via CRISPR-Cas. Cell Syst. 2016; 1(1):88-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2015.02.001. View

4.
Mao Y, Sun M, Desai S, Liu L . SUMO-1 conjugation to topoisomerase I: A possible repair response to topoisomerase-mediated DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97(8):4046-51. PMC: 18143. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.080536597. View

5.
Lu Y, Ye X, Guo R, Huang J, Wang W, Tang J . Genome-wide Targeted Mutagenesis in Rice Using the CRISPR/Cas9 System. Mol Plant. 2017; 10(9):1242-1245. DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.06.007. View