Unique Mechanisms for the Availability of Declarative Memory Elements and the Strengthening of Cognitive Operations

Overview

Journal Adv Cogn Psychol

Specialty Psychology

Date 2023 Sep 15

PMID 37711394

Authors

Dale A Hirsch

Christopher A Was

Erin N Graham

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of memory for prior cognitive operations and availability of declarative memory elements in long-term semantic priming. The impetus for this investigation was the role of working memory (WM) in complex cognitive processing. Empirical estimates of WM are too limited to explain complex cognitive processes. Therefore, contemporary models of WM propose access to long-term memory (LTM) to expand these limits. The priming literature provides one theoretical mechanism for access to LTM: long-term semantic priming. However, explanations for long-term semantic priming include both increased availability of LTM elements and the facilitation of prior cognitive operations. Our goal was to examine if the facilitation of prior cognitive operations is dependent on the availability of previously encountered LTM elements. A task used in previous research proposed to capture the facilitation of cognitive operations coupled with a directed forgetting manipulation was used to examine this relationship. Three experiments were conducted to that end. All experiments resulted in facilitation of the procedure of categorization. Experiments 1 and 2 additionally found relatively poor recognition for items that participants were told to forget despite the fact that categorization was facilitated for related items. Experiment 3 resulted in similarly poor recognition for category names that participants were told to forget. Taken together, the experiments in this investigation demonstrate a clear separation between the cognitive operations and declarative elements of the categorization task. Namely, the continued availability of declarative elements is not necessary for the subsequent facilitation of categorization operations.

References

Conway A, Kane M, Engle R . Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003; 7(12):547-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.005. View

Braver S, Thoemmes F, Rosenthal R . Continuously Cumulating Meta-Analysis and Replicability. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015; 9(3):333-42. DOI: 10.1177/1745691614529796. View

Ratcliff R, McKoon G . A retrieval theory of priming in memory. Psychol Rev. 1988; 95(3):385-408. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.95.3.385. View

Hourihan K, Taylor T . Cease remembering: control processes in directed forgetting. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006; 32(6):1354-65. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1354. View

Just M, Carpenter P . A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory. Psychol Rev. 1992; 99(1):122-49. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.99.1.122. View

Ericsson K, Kintsch W . Long-term working memory. Psychol Rev. 1995; 102(2):211-45. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.102.2.211. View

Woltz D, Was C . Availability of related long-term memory during and after attention focus in working memory. Mem Cognit. 2006; 34(3):668-84. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193587. View

Taylor T, Fawcett J . Larger IOR effects following forget than following remember instructions depend on exogenous attentional withdrawal and target localization. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011; 73(6):1790-814. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-011-0146-2. View

Seger C . Implicit learning. Psychol Bull. 1994; 115(2):163-96. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.163. View

10.

Joordens S, Becker S . The long and short of semantic priming effects in lexical decision. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1997; 23(5):1083-105. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.23.5.1083. View

11.

Oberauer K . Access to information in working memory: exploring the focus of attention. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002; 28(3):411-21. View

12.

Cowan N . Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system. Psychol Bull. 1988; 104(2):163-91. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.104.2.163. View

13.

Woltz D, Was C . Available but unattended conceptual information in working memory: temporarily active semantic content or persistent memory for prior operations?. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007; 33(1):155-68. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.155. View

14.

Zamary A, Rawson K, Was C . Do complex span and content-embedded working memory tasks predict unique variance in inductive reasoning?. Behav Res Methods. 2018; 51(6):2546-2558. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-018-1104-x. View

15.

Taylor T . Inhibition of return following instructions to remember and forget. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2005; 58(4):613-29. DOI: 10.1080/02724980443000115. View

16.

Was C, Dunlosky J, Bailey H, Rawson K . The unique contributions of the facilitation of procedural memory and working memory to individual differences in intelligence. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012; 139(3):425-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.12.016. View

17.

Vandierendonck A . Further Tests of the Utility of Integrated Speed-Accuracy Measures in Task Switching. J Cogn. 2019; 1(1):8. PMC: 6646946. DOI: 10.5334/joc.6. View

18.

Taylor T, Cutmore L, Pries L . Item-method directed forgetting: Effects at retrieval?. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017; 183:116-123. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.12.004. View

19.

Cowan N . The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behav Brain Sci. 2001; 24(1):87-114; discussion 114-85. DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x01003922. View

20.

Hughes A, Whittlesea B . Long-term semantic transfer: an overlapping-operations account. Mem Cognit. 2003; 31(3):401-11. DOI: 10.3758/bf03194398. View