» Articles » PMID: 37709569

Scale of Analysis Drives the Observed Ratio of Spatial to Non-spatial Variance in Microbial Water Quality: Insights from Two Decades of Citizen Science Data

Overview
Date 2023 Sep 14
PMID 37709569
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: While fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) testing is used to monitor surface water for potential health hazards, observed variation in FIB levels may depend on the scale of analysis (SOA). Two decades of citizen science data, coupled with random effects models, were used to quantify the variance in FIB levels attributable to spatial versus temporal factors.

Methods And Results: Separately, Bayesian models were used to quantify the ratio of spatial to non-spatial variance in FIB levels and identify associations between environmental factors and FIB levels. Separate analyses were performed for three SOA: waterway, watershed, and statewide. As SOA increased (from waterway to watershed to statewide models), variance attributable to spatial sources generally increased and variance attributable to temporal sources generally decreased. While relationships between FIB levels and environmental factors, such as flow conditions (base versus stormflow), were constant across SOA, the effect of land cover was highly dependent on SOA and consistently smaller than the effect of stormwater infrastructure (e.g. outfalls).

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the importance of SOA when developing water quality monitoring programs or designing future studies to inform water management.

Citing Articles

Methodological differences between studies confound one-size-fits-all approaches to managing surface waterways for food and water safety.

Weller D, Murphy C, Love T, Danyluk M, Strawn L Appl Environ Microbiol. 2024; 90(2):e0183523.

PMID: 38214516 PMC: 10880618. DOI: 10.1128/aem.01835-23.


Structural Equation Models Suggest That On-Farm Noncrop Vegetation Removal Is Not Associated with Improved Food Safety Outcomes but Is Linked to Impaired Water Quality.

Weller D, Love T, Weller D, Murphy C, Rahm B, Wiedmann M Appl Environ Microbiol. 2022; 88(23):e0160022.

PMID: 36409131 PMC: 9746293. DOI: 10.1128/aem.01600-22.

References
1.
Partyka M, Bond R, Chase J, Atwill E . Spatiotemporal Variability in Microbial Quality of Western US Agricultural Water Supplies: A Multistate Study. J Environ Qual. 2018; 47(5):939-948. DOI: 10.2134/jeq2017.12.0501. View

2.
Lee S, Levy D, Craun G, Beach M, Calderon R . Surveillance for waterborne-disease outbreaks--United States, 1999-2000. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2002; 51(8):1-47. View

3.
Muirhead R, Davies-Colley R, Donnison A, Nagels J . Faecal bacteria yields in artificial flood events: quantifying in-stream stores. Water Res. 2004; 38(5):1215-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2003.12.010. View

4.
Licence K, Oates K, Synge B, Reid T . An outbreak of E. coli O157 infection with evidence of spread from animals to man through contamination of a private water supply. Epidemiol Infect. 2001; 126(1):135-8. PMC: 2869664. View

5.
Rafi K, Wagner K, Gentry T, Karthikeyan R, Dube A . Concentration as a Function of Stream Order and Watershed Size. J Environ Qual. 2018; 47(5):949-957. DOI: 10.2134/jeq2017.12.0488. View