» Articles » PMID: 37705542

Comparative Evaluation of the Quality and Homogeneity of Different Obturating Systems Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography - An Study

Overview
Date 2023 Sep 14
PMID 37705542
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the homogeneity and quality of different obturating systems using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Materials And Methods: One hundred and twenty extracted maxillary and mandibular molars were included in this study which was decoronated first and then dissected into palatal and distal roots. After working length determination, all the roots were biomechanically prepared with ProTaper universal system. The prepared roots were evaluated using CBCT, and volumetric analysis was done. Samples were then randomly divided into three groups corresponding to the obturation method used - cold lateral compaction technique, single-cone technique, and BeeFill 2 in 1 system. After obturation, CBCT imaging and volumetric analyses were performed again to compare and analyze the amount of volume of obturation in different obturating techniques. To standardize the volume, pre-and postobturation images were superimposed. To avoid errors, for each section, measurements were repeated three times and the means were calculated.

Statistical Analysis Used: The data were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance, followed by post hoc test.

Results: Results showed a statistically significant difference of the single cone with lateral compaction and the BeeFill system ( < 0.001). Maximum volume of obturating material was found in BeeFill at all levels - Coronal, middle, and apical, followed by cold lateral compaction and single-cone technique ( < 0.001).

Conclusion: It could be concluded that the thermoplasticized obturating technique can be a better choice for obturation rather than the single cone and lateral compaction technique.

Citing Articles

Dentinal tubular penetration ability of epoxy resin-based and bioceramic-based root canal sealers.

Saricam E, Altinisik H BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):1506.

PMID: 39702161 PMC: 11660547. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-05311-5.

References
1.
Dadresanfar B, Khalilak Z, Shiekholeslami M, Afshar S . Comparative study of the sealing ability of the lateral condensation technique and the BeeFill system after canal preparation by the Mtwo NiTi rotary system. J Oral Sci. 2010; 52(2):281-5. DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.52.281. View

2.
Vishwanath V, Rao H . Gutta-percha in endodontics - A comprehensive review of material science. J Conserv Dent. 2019; 22(3):216-222. PMC: 6632621. DOI: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_420_18. View

3.
Kandaswamy D, Venkateshbabu N, Krishna R, Hannah R, Arathi G, Roohi R . Comparison of laterally condensed, vertically compacted thermoplasticized, cold free-flow GP obturations - A volumetric analysis using spiral CT. J Conserv Dent. 2010; 12(4):145-9. PMC: 2879726. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.58334. View

4.
Somma F, Cretella G, Carotenuto M, Pecci R, Bedini R, De Biasi M . Quality of thermoplasticized and single point root fillings assessed by micro-computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2011; 44(4):362-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01840.x. View

5.
Collins J, Walker M, Kulild J, Lee C . A comparison of three gutta-percha obturation techniques to replicate canal irregularities. J Endod. 2006; 32(8):762-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.001. View