» Articles » PMID: 37704908

Prevalence of Atrial Fibrillation and Reasons for Undertreatment with Oral Anticoagulants

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF), the proportion of AF patients not receiving oral anticoagulation (OAC) and reasons for abstaining from OAC treatment.

Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study of patients aged 18 years or older with an AF diagnosis on June 1st 2020 in Västernorrland County, Sweden. AF diagnosis was retrieved using the ICD10 code I.48, and medical records were reviewed for comorbidities and documented reasons to abstain OAC treatment.

Results: Of 197 274 residents in Västernorrland County, 4.7% (9 304/197 274) had a documented AF diagnosis. Of these, 19% (1 768/9 304) had no OAC treatment, including 4.2% (393/9 304) with no indication, 2.5% (233/9 304) with a questionable and 2.5% (231/9 304) with a documented clear contraindication for OAC. In total 9.8% (911/9 304) were not treated with OAC despite indication and no reasonable documented contraindication, thus 90.8% (8 447/9 304) of all AF-patients were eligible for OAC treatment. Common reasons for abstaining treatment without reasonable contraindication were present sinus rhythm in 13.7% (125/911), perceived not an OAC candidate in 10.6% (97/911) and anemia in the past in 4.3% (39/911).

Conclusions: In the population of Västernorrland County, a very high AF prevalence of 4.7% was found, of which just over 90% would theoretically benefit from OAC treatment. This is higher than previously reported and stresses the importance of stroke prevention in this large patient group.

References
1.
Mas Dalmau G, Sant Arderiu E, Enfedaque Montes M, Sola I, Pequeno Saco S, Alonso Coello P . Patients' and physicians' perceptions and attitudes about oral anticoagulation and atrial fibrillation: a qualitative systematic review. BMC Fam Pract. 2017; 18(1):3. PMC: 5234257. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-016-0574-0. View

2.
Friberg L, Hammar N, Ringh M, Pettersson H, Rosenqvist M . Stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation: who gets it and who does not? Report from the Stockholm Cohort-study on Atrial Fibrillation (SCAF-study). Eur Heart J. 2006; 27(16):1954-64. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl146. View

3.
Friberg L, Bergfeldt L . Atrial fibrillation prevalence revisited. J Intern Med. 2013; 274(5):461-8. DOI: 10.1111/joim.12114. View

4.
Bjorck F, Ek A, Johansson L, Sjalander A . Warfarin persistence among atrial fibrillation patients - why is treatment ended?. Cardiovasc Ther. 2016; 34(6):468-474. DOI: 10.1111/1755-5922.12224. View

5.
Glazer N, Dublin S, Smith N, French B, Jackson L, Hrachovec J . Newly detected atrial fibrillation and compliance with antithrombotic guidelines. Arch Intern Med. 2007; 167(3):246-52. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.167.3.246. View