» Articles » PMID: 37700946

Early Surgical Reconstruction Versus Rehabilitation for Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2023 Sep 13
PMID 37700946
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a common and debilitating knee injury that can significantly impair knee function and stability. The optimal management of ACL injuries remains a topic of ongoing debate, with two primary treatment approaches being surgical reconstruction and adequate rehabilitation. The aim of this study is to compare the knee function and stability outcomes between these two treatment modalities, shedding light on their respective effectiveness. We utilized Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Database, MEDLINE, and Web of Science from inception until April 20, 2022. We utilized the Cochrane risk of bias tool for quality assessment. The following outcomes were assessed: Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee score, Lysholm score, the occurrence of the knee giving way, Tegner score, KT1000, Lachman test, pivot shift test, SF-36 score to assess the quality of life, and incidence of reinjury and reoperation. We included a total of six trials with a population sample size of 691 patients, which were divided into surgical versus non-surgical groups, accounting for 348 and 343 patients, respectively. The pooled estimate demonstrated that the surgical reconstruction was associated with a significant increase in the IKDC score (MD = 7.49 [2.04, 12.94], (P = 0.007)), and KOOS score was significant in the reconstruction cohort (MD = 5.87 [1.64, 10.09], (P = 0.007)). The incidences of reoperation (RR = 0.43 [0.20, 0.91], (P = 0.03)), reinjury (RR = 0.49 [0.27, 0.88], (P = 0.02)), and occurrence of the knee giving way (RR = 0.19 [0.08, 0.49], (P = 0.005)) were significantly decreased in the surgical cohort. There is no significant difference between both cohorts regarding the Lysholm score (1.27 [-1.39, 3.93], (P = 0.35)). The findings of this comprehensive analysis indicate that early reconstruction does not demonstrate clear superiority over rehabilitation alone in terms of knee function, Lysholm score, and Tegner score among patients with ACL rupture. However, early reconstruction does exhibit a substantial reduction in the incidence of reinjury, reoperation, and knee giving way, suggesting potential benefits in terms of stability outcomes. These results underscore the importance of considering individual patient characteristics and preferences in treatment decision-making.

Citing Articles

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Young Athletes: A Comprehensive Review of Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Techniques.

Patil B, Goyal S, Salwan A, Singh R Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e70333.

PMID: 39469369 PMC: 11513215. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.70333.

References
1.
Tsoukas D, Fotopoulos V, Basdekis G, Makridis K . No difference in osteoarthritis after surgical and non-surgical treatment of ACL-injured knees after 10 years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015; 24(9):2953-2959. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3593-9. View

2.
Lohmander L, Ostenberg A, Englund M, Roos H . High prevalence of knee osteoarthritis, pain, and functional limitations in female soccer players twelve years after anterior cruciate ligament injury. Arthritis Rheum. 2004; 50(10):3145-52. DOI: 10.1002/art.20589. View

3.
Liow R, McNicholas M, Keating J, Nutton R . Ligament repair and reconstruction in traumatic dislocation of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003; 85(6):845-51. View

4.
Arneja S, Leith J . Review article: Validity of the KT-1000 knee ligament arthrometer. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2009; 17(1):77-9. DOI: 10.1177/230949900901700117. View

5.
von Porat A, Roos E, Roos H . High prevalence of osteoarthritis 14 years after an anterior cruciate ligament tear in male soccer players: a study of radiographic and patient relevant outcomes. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004; 63(3):269-73. PMC: 1754918. DOI: 10.1136/ard.2003.008136. View