» Articles » PMID: 37698993

The Ecological Footprint of Physicians: A Survey of Physicians in Canada, India, and USA

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2023 Sep 12
PMID 37698993
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Combating climate change may be the greatest public health opportunity of the 21st century. While physicians play an important role in addressing climate change, given their affluence in society, they may be an important source of greenhouse gas emissions themselves. We sought to examine the size and nature of the ecological footprint of physicians and medical students. We conducted an online survey from December 2021-May 2022 examining resource consumption, changes in consumption patterns over time, and beliefs about climate change. Participants were medical students, residents, and staff physicians in Canada, India, or USA. Only 20 out of 162 valid respondents had a low ecological footprint (12%), defined as meat intake ≤2 times per week, living in an apartment or condominium, and using public transport, bicycle, motorcycle or walking to work. 14 of these 20 participants were from India. 91% of participants were open to reducing their own ecological footprint, though only 40% had made changes in that regard. 49% participants who discussed climate change at work and at home had decreased their ecological footprint, compared to 29% of participants who rarely engaged in such conversations (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.24-4.63, P = 0.01). We conclude that physicians have a large ecological footprint, especially those from Canada and USA. A majority of physicians are interested in reducing their ecological footprint, and those who engage in conversations around climate change are more likely to have done so. Talking frequently about climate change, at work and at home, will likely increase climate change action amongst physicians.

Citing Articles

Asymmetric effects of foreign direct investment and globalization on ecological footprint in Indonesia.

Van Tran H, Tran A, Bui Hoang N, Mai T PLoS One. 2024; 19(1):e0297046.

PMID: 38277414 PMC: 10834062. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297046.

References
1.
Kitzes J, Wackernagel M, Loh J, Peller A, Goldfinger S, Cheng D . Shrink and share: humanity's present and future Ecological Footprint. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007; 363(1491):467-75. PMC: 2610164. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2164. View

2.
Grossi G, Goglio P, Vitali A, Williams A . Livestock and climate change: impact of livestock on climate and mitigation strategies. Anim Front. 2020; 9(1):69-76. PMC: 7015462. DOI: 10.1093/af/vfy034. View

3.
D Reschovsky J, Staiti A . Physician incomes in rural and urban America. Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change. 2005; (92):1-4. View

4.
Hill M, Bleicher R, Farma J . A How-To Guide: Virtual Interviews in the Era of Social Distancing. J Surg Educ. 2020; 78(1):321-323. PMC: 7391954. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.07.016. View

5.
Humphrey J . International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War. Some personal reflections. Lancet. 1987; 2(8572):1389-90. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)91273-6. View