Assessment of the Efficacy of Reduced-radiation Noncontrast Computed Tomography Scan Compared with the Standard Noncontrast Computed Tomography Scan for Detecting Urolithiasis: A Prospective Single-center Study

Overview

Journal Curr Urol

Specialty Urology

Date 2023 Sep 11

PMID 37692141

Authors

Gaurav Aggarwal

Samiran Das Adhikary

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Noncontrast computed tomography (CT) scan of the kidneys, ureter and bladder is the standard investigative modality for diagnosing and following up patients with urolithiasis. With each scan, a patient receives radiation of 18-34 mGy. Dose considerations become pertinent because of a 10% lifetime incidence rate and higher than 50% risk of recurrence, necessitating repeated imaging in the lifetime of a stone former. Hence, this study aimed to assess the sensitivity of "reduced-radiation" CT imaging by altering scan settings to lower than the "standard" norms.

Materials And Methods: Altogether, 222 patients (255 "kidney-ureter" stone-bearing units or "renal units") with urolithiasis and patients undergoing CT for other reasons with incidental findings of renal/ureteric calculi between 2017 and 2019 were included. All patients were subjected to 3 sequential scans at tube current settings of 250 mA (CT-N/Standard), 100 mA (CT-100), and 50 mA (CT-50) at a constant voltage of 120 kV. Their clinicodemographic and radiological findings were recorded and assessed for significance.

Results: Of the 255 renal units, 117 were between 30 and 44 years of age, 75% were men. Of the 255 patients, 178 (70.1%) reported a first stone episode and 77 had recurrence. Lower ureteric calculi were predominant (40.4%). All calculi were identified on CT-N; CT-100 failed to detect calculi in 1 patient, and CT-50 failed in 3 patients, where all calculi were <3 mm in size. Meanwhile, none were undetected among patients with obesity. The sensitivity was 99.61% for the CT-100 and 98.82% for the CT-50, which indicated a 2.5 and 5 times lower radiation and dose/length, respectively, than CT-N.

Conclusions: The reduced-radiation CT scan is safe, sensitive, and accurate for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with urolithiasis with significantly lower radiation exposures. Our study lays the foundation to accept low-dose CT in general and CT-50 in particular, as the new "standard of care," and attempt further dose reduction without loss of diagnostic efficacy.

References

Uppot R, Sahani D, Hahn P, Kalra M, Saini S, Mueller P . Effect of obesity on image quality: fifteen-year longitudinal study for evaluation of dictated radiology reports. Radiology. 2006; 240(2):435-9. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2402051110. View

Dalla Palma L, Pozzi-Mucelli R, Stacul F . Present-day imaging of patients with renal colic. Eur Radiol. 2001; 11(1):4-17. DOI: 10.1007/s003300000589. View

Liu W, Esler S, Kenny B, Goh R, Rainbow A, Stevenson G . Low-dose nonenhanced helical CT of renal colic: assessment of ureteric stone detection and measurement of effective dose equivalent. Radiology. 2001; 215(1):51-4. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.215.1.r00ap4051. View

Romero V, Akpinar H, Assimos D . Kidney stones: a global picture of prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors. Rev Urol. 2010; 12(2-3):e86-96. PMC: 2931286. View

Gervaise A, Naulet P, Beuret F, Henry C, Pernin M, Portron Y . Low-dose CT with automatic tube current modulation, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and low tube voltage for the diagnosis of renal colic: impact of body mass index. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014; 202(3):553-60. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.11350. View

Varanelli M, Coll D, Levine J, Rosenfield A, Smith R . Relationship between duration of pain and secondary signs of obstruction of the urinary tract on unenhanced helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001; 177(2):325-30. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.177.2.1770325. View

Preminger G, Tiselius H, Assimos D, Alken P, Buck C, Gallucci M . 2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol. 2007; 178(6):2418-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.107. View

Moore C, Daniels B, Ghita M, Gunabushanam G, Luty S, Molinaro A . Accuracy of reduced-dose computed tomography for ureteral stones in emergency department patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2014; 65(2):189-98.e2. PMC: 5131573. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.09.008. View

Tack D, Sourtzis S, Delpierre I, De Maertelaer V, Gevenois P . Low-dose unenhanced multidetector CT of patients with suspected renal colic. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003; 180(2):305-11. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.180.2.1800305. View

10.

Sheafor D, Hertzberg B, Freed K, Carroll B, Keogan M, Paulson E . Nonenhanced helical CT and US in the emergency evaluation of patients with renal colic: prospective comparison. Radiology. 2000; 217(3):792-7. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.217.3.r00dc41792. View

11.

Kim B, Hwang I, Choi Y, Namkung S, Kim H, Hwang W . Low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced helical computed tomography for the assessment of acute renal colic: prospective comparative study. Acta Radiol. 2005; 46(7):756-63. DOI: 10.1080/02841850500216004. View

12.

Sierzenski P, Linton O, Amis Jr E, Courtney D, Larson P, Mahesh M . Applications of justification and optimization in medical imaging: examples of clinical guidance for computed tomography use in emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med. 2013; 63(1):25-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.08.027. View

13.

Abou El-Ghar M, Shokeir A, Refaie H, El-Nahas A . Low-dose unenhanced computed tomography for diagnosing stone disease in obese patients. Arab J Urol. 2015; 10(3):279-83. PMC: 4442952. DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2012.02.007. View

14.

Kluner C, Hein P, Gralla O, Hein E, Hamm B, Romano V . Does ultra-low-dose CT with a radiation dose equivalent to that of KUB suffice to detect renal and ureteral calculi?. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2005; 30(1):44-50. DOI: 10.1097/01.rct.0000191685.58838.ef. View

15.

Caoili E, Cohan R, Korobkin M, Platt J, Francis I, Faerber G . Urinary tract abnormalities: initial experience with multi-detector row CT urography. Radiology. 2002; 222(2):353-60. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2222010667. View

16.

Denton E, MacKenzie A, Greenwell T, Popert R, Rankin S . Unenhanced helical CT for renal colic--is the radiation dose justifiable?. Clin Radiol. 1999; 54(7):444-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(99)90829-2. View

17.

Teichman J . Clinical practice. Acute renal colic from ureteral calculus. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350(7):684-93. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMcp030813. View

18.

Poletti P, Platon A, Rutschmann O, Verdun F, Schmidlin F, Iselin C . Abdominal plain film in patients admitted with clinical suspicion of renal colic: should it be replaced by low-dose computed tomography?. Urology. 2006; 67(1):64-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.07.042. View

19.

Meagher T, Sukumar V, Collingwood J, Crawley T, Schofield D, Henson J . Low dose computed tomography in suspected acute renal colic. Clin Radiol. 2001; 56(11):873-6. DOI: 10.1053/crad.2001.0842. View

20.

Mazrani W, McHugh K, Marsden P . The radiation burden of radiological investigations. Arch Dis Child. 2007; 92(12):1127-31. PMC: 2066089. DOI: 10.1136/adc.2006.101782. View