Striving to Be of Value: Building a Virtual Radiology Consult Service for Patients

Overview

Journal Curr Probl Diagn Radiol

Specialty Radiology

Date 2023 Sep 10

PMID 37690967

Authors

Colbey W Freeman

Sophia OBrien

Dayna Levin

Tessa Cook

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: Direct interactions between patients and diagnostic radiologists are uncommon, but recent medicolegal developments in the United States may increase patient interest in communicating directly with radiologists. Patient participation rates in prior attempts at direct radiology consultation vary widely in the literature. Our objective was to design and build a virtual radiology consult service for a subset of patients undergoing lung cancer screening CTs to enable communication between patients and radiologists regarding imaging results and radiology recommendations.

Methods: Patients scheduled for lung cancer screening CTs were identified using a custom scheduling system and offered via text message a free 15-minute consultation with a radiologist to discuss the results.

Results: Of 38 patients texted, 10 (26.3%) responded. Nine (90%) scheduled a consultation, but 5 (55.5%) subsequently cancelled. Of the remaining four, 3 (75%) attended their appointments, with an overall 3/38 (7.9%) text-to-consult conversation rate. The 3 consults averaged 18 (±8.2) minutes.

Conclusion: The recruitment rate for our virtual service was between the low rate of a prior phone consult line study and the high rate in consults integrated into another physician visit. Further research is needed to identify patients most interested in a radiology consultation and optimize consultation modality by patient population.

References

Henshaw D, Okawa G, Ching K, Garrido T, Qian H, Tsai J . Access to Radiology Reports via an Online Patient Portal: Experiences of Referring Physicians and Patients. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015; 12(6):582-6.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.01.015. View

Pahade J, Couto C, Davis R, Patel P, Siewert B, Rosen M . Reviewing imaging examination results with a radiologist immediately after study completion: patient preferences and assessment of feasibility in an academic department. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 199(4):844-51. PMC: 3786865. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.8064. View

Gutzeit A, Heiland R, Sudarski S, Froehlich J, Hergan K, Meissnitzer M . Direct communication between radiologists and patients following imaging examinations. Should radiologists rethink their patient care?. Eur Radiol. 2018; 29(1):224-231. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5503-2. View

Smith J, Gunderman R . Should we inform patients of radiology results?. Radiology. 2010; 255(2):317-21. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10091608. View

Miles R, Hippe D, Elmore J, Wang C, Payne T, Lee C . Patient Access to Online Radiology Reports: Frequency and Sociodemographic Characteristics Associated with Use. Acad Radiol. 2016; 23(9):1162-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.05.005. View

Mangano M, Rahman A, Choy G, Sahani D, Boland G, Gunn A . Radiologists' role in the communication of imaging examination results to patients: perceptions and preferences of patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014; 203(5):1034-9. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.14.12470. View

Mangano M, Bennett S, Gunn A, Sahani D, Choy G . Creating a Patient-Centered Radiology Practice Through the Establishment of a Diagnostic Radiology Consultation Clinic. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015; 205(1):95-9. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.14.14165. View

Cabarrus M, Naeger D, Rybkin A, Qayyum A . Patients Prefer Results From the Ordering Provider and Access to Their Radiology Reports. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015; 12(6):556-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.12.009. View

Kemp J, Short R, Bryant S, Sample L, Befera N . Patient-Friendly Radiology Reporting-Implementation and Outcomes. J Am Coll Radiol. 2022; 19(2 Pt B):377-383. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.10.008. View

10.

Johnson A, Frankel R, Williams L, Glover S, Easterling D . Patient access to radiology reports: what do physicians think?. J Am Coll Radiol. 2010; 7(4):281-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.10.011. View

11.

Giardina T, Callen J, Georgiou A, Westbrook J, Greisinger A, Esquivel A . Releasing test results directly to patients: A multisite survey of physician perspectives. Patient Educ Couns. 2015; 98(6):788-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.02.011. View

12.

Mattay G, Mittl G, Zafar H, Cook T . Early Impact of Pennsylvania Act 112 on Follow-up of Abnormal Imaging Findings. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020; 17(12):1676-1683. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.05.014. View

13.

Oh S, Cook T, Kahn Jr C . PORTER: a Prototype System for Patient-Oriented Radiology Reporting. J Digit Imaging. 2016; 29(4):450-4. PMC: 4942390. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-016-9864-2. View

14.

Cross N, Wildenberg J, Liao G, Novak S, Bevilacqua T, Chen J . The voice of the radiologist: Enabling patients to speak directly to radiologists. Clin Imaging. 2020; 61:84-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.09.014. View

15.

Mervak B, Davenport M, Flynt K, Kazerooni E, Weadock W . What the Patient Wants: An Analysis of Radiology-Related Inquiries From a Web-Based Patient Portal. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016; 13(11):1311-1318. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.05.022. View

16.

Daye D, Joseph E, Flores E, Kambadakone A, Chinn G, Bennett S . Point-of-Care Virtual Radiology Consultations in Primary Care: A Feasibility Study of a New Model for Patient-Centered Care in Radiology. J Am Coll Radiol. 2021; 18(9):1239-1245. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.07.007. View