» Articles » PMID: 37682753

Adaptations to a Statewide Walking Program: Use of Iterative Feedback Cycles Between Research and Delivery Systems Improves Fit for over 10 Years

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

FitEx is an 8-week, group-based physical activity and fruit and vegetable consumption program co-created and implemented with the Cooperative Extension System. Effectiveness and delivery personnel perceptions of the program are promising; however, ongoing adaptations are required to continuously meet shifting needs of both researchers and delivery systems. We applied the APDER iterative cycles of implementation over 15 years to understand dynamic and ongoing adaptations as well as implications for FitEx sustainability. Each year, an IRPP between delivery (FitEx deliverers) and research (FitEx developers) systems shared feedback on program core elements and strategies for adaptation through regular team meetings, emails, and evaluations. While the core elements (delivering to groups, goal setting, feedback, and self-monitoring) of FitEx remained consistent, changes were made to address logistical factors, emergent research questions, and technological advancements. For example, program deliverers suggested decreasing training time and making program content available on demand rather than through traditional in-person training. Using APDER with a long-standing IRPP allowed the delivery system to provide feedback to program developers to co-create ongoing adaptations and data-driven decisions. Future work in response to shifting needs includes Fitbit integration and technological updates to the usability of the FitEx platform. Our aim is to report the 15+ years of applying the Assess, Plan, Do, Evaluate, Report (APDER) process with an integrated research-practice partnership (IRPP) for co-creation of ongoing adaptations of FitEx and to share methods for capturing relevant data for decision-making to integrate health promotion programs in community settings.

Citing Articles

Expanding methods to address RE-AIM metrics in hybrid effectiveness-implementation studies.

Harden S, Galaviz K, Estabrooks P Implement Sci Commun. 2024; 5(1):123.

PMID: 39497224 PMC: 11536891. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-024-00646-0.


A natural experiment to determine if FitEx works: Impact of a statewide walking program.

Harden S, Balis L, Armbruster S, Estabrooks P Transl Behav Med. 2023; 14(2):98-105.

PMID: 37748192 PMC: 10849176. DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibad058.

References
1.
Kerner J . Integrating research, practice, and policy: what we see depends on where we stand. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008; 14(2):193-8. DOI: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000311899.11197.db. View

2.
Murriel A, Kahin S, Pejavara A, OToole T . The High Obesity Program: Overview of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Cooperative Extension Services Efforts to Address Obesity. Prev Chronic Dis. 2020; 17:E25. PMC: 7085913. DOI: 10.5888/pcd17.190235. View

3.
Nilsen P . Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015; 10:53. PMC: 4406164. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0. View

4.
Sforzo G, Kaye M, Todorova I, Harenberg S, Costello K, Cobus-Kuo L . Compendium of the Health and Wellness Coaching Literature. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2018; 12(6):436-447. PMC: 6236633. DOI: 10.1177/1559827617708562. View

5.
Eckhardt J, Kaletka C, Kruger D, Maldonado-Mariscal K, Schulz A . Ecosystems of Co-Creation. Front Sociol. 2021; 6:642289. PMC: 8022567. DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.642289. View