» Articles » PMID: 37681569

Use of the Wearable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Among Patients With Myocarditis and Reduced Ejection Fraction or Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia: Data From a Multicenter Registry

Abstract

Background Data on the use of the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) among patients with myocarditis remain sparse. Consequently, evidence for guideline recommendations in this patient population is lacking. Methods and Results In total, 1596 consecutive patients were included in a multicenter registry from 8 European centers, with 124 patients (8%) having received the WCD due to myocarditis and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction or prior ventricular tachyarrhythmia. The mean age was 51.6±16.3 years, with 74% being male. Patients were discharged after index hospitalization on heart failure medication: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (62.5%), angiotensin-receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (22.9%), aldosterone-antagonists (51%), or beta blockers (91.4%). The initial median left ventricular ejection fraction was 30% (22%-45%) and increased to 48% (39%-55%) over long-term follow-up (<0.001). The median BNP (brain natriuretic peptide) level at baseline was 1702 pg/mL (565-3748) and decreased to 188 pg/mL (26-348) over long-term follow-up (=0.022). The mean wear time was 79.7±52.1 days and 21.0±4.9 hours per day. Arrhythmic event rates documented by the WCD were 9.7% for nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, 6.5% for sustained ventricular tachycardia, and 0% for ventricular fibrillation. Subsequently, 2.4% of patients experienced an appropriate WCD shock. The rate of inappropriate WCD shocks was 0.8%. All 3 patients with appropriate WCD shock had experienced ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation before WCD prescription, with only 1 patient showing a left ventricular ejection fraction <35%. Conclusions Patients with myocarditis and risk for occurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmia may benefit from WCD use. Prior ventricular arrhythmia might appear as a better risk predictor than a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction <35% in this population.

Citing Articles

Wearable cardioverter defibrillator after ICD-system explantation: data from a multicenter registry.

El-Battrawy I, Beiert T, Koepsel K, Kovacs B, Dreher T, Blockhaus C Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):7270.

PMID: 40025101 PMC: 11873030. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-91046-4.


Sudden cardiac death after acute myocarditis with arrhythmic presentation: hunting for risk predictors - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Narducci M, Ballacci F, Giordano F, Collini V, Imazio M Open Heart. 2025; 11(2).

PMID: 39882569 PMC: 11603706. DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-002985.


Appropriate use of wearable defibrillators with multiparametric evaluation to avoid unnecessary defibrillator implantation.

Matteucci A, Pignalberi C, Di Fusco S, Aiello A, Aquilani S, Nardi F Open Heart. 2024; 11(2).

PMID: 39299735 PMC: 11418522. DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-002787.


No beneficial use of the wearable cardioverter defibrillator among patients suffering from inherited and congenital heart disease: data from a European multicenter registry.

Koepsel K, Dreher T, Blockhaus C, Gotzmann M, Klein N, Kuntz T Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1384736.

PMID: 39049954 PMC: 11266015. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1384736.


Predictors of ventricular tachyarrhythmia in patients with a wearable cardioverter defibrillator: an international multicenter registry.

Kreimer F, Koepsel K, Gotzmann M, Kovacs B, Dreher T, Blockhaus C J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024; 67(8):1917-1928.

PMID: 38985244 PMC: 11606999. DOI: 10.1007/s10840-024-01869-w.

References
1.
Veltmann C, Winter S, Duncker D, Jungbauer C, Wassnig N, Geller J . Protected risk stratification with the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator: results from the WEARIT-II-EUROPE registry. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020; 110(1):102-113. PMC: 7806570. DOI: 10.1007/s00392-020-01657-2. View

2.
Beiert T, Malotki R, Kraemer N, Stockigt F, Linhart M, Nickenig G . A real world wearable cardioverter defibrillator experience - Very high appropriate shock rate in ischemic cardiomyopathy patients at a European single-center. J Electrocardiol. 2017; 50(5):603-609. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2017.04.017. View

3.
Wassnig N, Gunther M, Quick S, Pfluecke C, Rottstadt F, Szymkiewicz S . Experience With the Wearable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Patients at High Risk for Sudden Cardiac Death. Circulation. 2016; 134(9):635-43. PMC: 4998124. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.019124. View

4.
Blaschke F, Lacour P, Dang P, Parwani A, Hohendanner F, Walter T . Wearable cardioverter-defibrillator: friend or foe in suspected myocarditis?. ESC Heart Fail. 2021; 8(4):2591-2596. PMC: 8318471. DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.13340. View

5.
Hung Y, Lin W, Lin C, Cheng S, Tsai T, Yang S . The Prognostic Role of QTc Interval in Acute Myocarditis. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2016; 32(2):223-30. PMC: 4816921. DOI: 10.6515/acs20150226a. View