» Articles » PMID: 37680649

Fulfillment and Validity of the Kidney Health Evaluation Measure for People with Diabetes

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the fulfillment and validity of the kidney health evaluation for people with diabetes (KED) Healthcare Effectiveness Data Information Set (HEDIS) measure.

Patients And Methods: Optum Labs Data Warehouse (OLDW) was used to identify the nationally distributed US population aged 18 years and older, with diabetes, between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2017. The OLDW includes deidentified medical, pharmacy, laboratory, and electronic health record (EHR) data. The KED fulfillment was defined in 2017 as both estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio testing within the measurement year. The KED validity was assessed using bivariate analyses of KED fulfillment with diabetes care measures in 2017 and chronic kidney disease (CKD) diagnosis and evidence-based kidney protective interventions in 2018.

Results: Among eligible 5,635,619 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries, 736,875 Medicare advantage (MA) beneficiaries, and 660,987 commercial patients, KED fulfillment was 32.2%, 38.7%, and 37.7%, respectively. Albuminuria testing limited KED fulfillment with urinary albumin-creatinine ratio testing (<40%) and eGFR testing (>90%). The KED fulfillment was positively associated with receipt of diabetes care in 2017, CKD diagnosis in 2018, and evidence-based kidney protective interventions in 2018. The KED fulfillment trended lower for Black race, Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibility status, low neighborhood income, and low education status.

Conclusion: Less than 40% of adults with diabetes received guideline-recommended testing for CKD in 2017. Routine KED was associated with diabetes care and evidence-based CKD interventions. Increasing guideline-recommended testing for CKD among people with diabetes should lead to timely and equitable CKD detection and treatment.

Citing Articles

Fibroblast growth factor 23 predicts incident diabetic kidney disease: A 4.6-year prospective study.

Liu D, Yu S, Zhang Y, Li Q, Kang P, Wang L Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025; 27(4):2232-2241.

PMID: 39895483 PMC: 11885106. DOI: 10.1111/dom.16224.


A retrospective multi-site examination of chronic kidney disease using longitudinal laboratory results and metadata to identify clinical and financial risk.

Fung M, Haghamad A, Montgomery E, Swanson K, Wilkerson M, Stathakos K BMC Nephrol. 2024; 25(1):447.

PMID: 39639199 PMC: 11622455. DOI: 10.1186/s12882-024-03869-4.


Screening, identifying, and treating chronic kidney disease: why, who, when, how, and what?.

Farrell D, Vassalotti J BMC Nephrol. 2024; 25(1):34.

PMID: 38273240 PMC: 10809507. DOI: 10.1186/s12882-024-03466-5.

References
1.
Hemmelgarn B, Manns B, Lloyd A, James M, Klarenbach S, Quinn R . Relation between kidney function, proteinuria, and adverse outcomes. JAMA. 2010; 303(5):423-9. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.39. View

2.
Vassalotti J, Centor R, Turner B, Greer R, Choi M, Sequist T . Practical Approach to Detection and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease for the Primary Care Clinician. Am J Med. 2015; 129(2):153-162.e7. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.08.025. View

3.
Scirica B, Mosenzon O, Bhatt D, Udell J, Steg P, McGuire D . Cardiovascular Outcomes According to Urinary Albumin and Kidney Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes at High Cardiovascular Risk: Observations From the SAVOR-TIMI 53 Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2017; 3(2):155-163. PMC: 6594440. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.4228. View

4.
Sarnak M, Amann K, Bangalore S, Cavalcante J, Charytan D, Craig J . Chronic Kidney Disease and Coronary Artery Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 74(14):1823-1838. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.1017. View

5.
Grams M, Sang Y, Ballew S, Carrero J, Djurdjev O, Heerspink H . Predicting timing of clinical outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease and severely decreased glomerular filtration rate. Kidney Int. 2018; 93(6):1442-1451. PMC: 5967981. DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.01.009. View