» Articles » PMID: 37680252

Effects of a Virtually Delivered Reading and Embedded Mindset Intervention on Reading Performance for Fourth-Grader Struggling Readers

Overview
Journal Top Lang Disord
Date 2023 Sep 8
PMID 37680252
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of a virtual intensive reading intervention embedded with mindset training compared to typical reading instruction in a business-as-usual (BAU) condition delivered to fourth grade students with or at-risk for reading disabilities. After screening, the 59 participants were stratified and assigned randomly to condition. Highly trained interventionists delivered the intervention one-to-one with high fidelity and student engagement during the intensive intervention. Classroom teachers delivered the BAU. We examined the effects of the intervention on a variety of standardized timed and untimed measures of word reading and decoding, reading fluency, comprehension, and mindset. We addressed two research questions: What are the effects of intensive virtual reading intervention embedded with mindset training relative to a business-as-usual comparison (BAU) on the reading outcomes of fourth grade students with or at-risk for reading disabilities? Was initial mindset related to student response to intervention? Data analyses examined the main effect and moderation using linear mixed effects models. Significant differences in reading favored the virtual treatment condition for letter and word identification ( = 0.38). No other significant effects were observed. We note limitations in our study and offer directions for future research, including the need to explore additional moderators.

References
1.
Wanzek J, Al Otaiba S, Petscher Y, Lemons C, Gesel S, Fluhler S . Comparing the Effects of Reading Intervention Versus Reading and Mindset Intervention for Upper Elementary Students With Reading Difficulties. J Learn Disabil. 2020; 54(3):203-220. PMC: 8075103. DOI: 10.1177/0022219420949281. View

2.
Petscher Y, Al Otaiba S, Wanzek J . A Study of the Factor Structure, Profiles, and Concurrent Validity of the Mindset Assessment Profile Tool for Elementary Students. J Psychoeduc Assess. 2023; 39(1):74-88. PMC: 10120915. DOI: 10.1177/0734282920943456. View

3.
Sisk V, Burgoyne A, Sun J, Butler J, Macnamara B . To What Extent and Under Which Circumstances Are Growth Mind-Sets Important to Academic Achievement? Two Meta-Analyses. Psychol Sci. 2018; 29(4):549-571. DOI: 10.1177/0956797617739704. View

4.
Toste J, Capin P, Williams K, Cho E, Vaughn S . Replication of an Experimental Study Investigating the Efficacy of a Multisyllabic Word Reading Intervention With and Without Motivational Beliefs Training for Struggling Readers. J Learn Disabil. 2018; 52(1):45-58. DOI: 10.1177/0022219418775114. View

5.
Aaron P, Joshi R, Gooden R, Bentum K . Diagnosis and treatment of reading disabilities based on the component model of reading: an alternative to the discrepancy model of LD. J Learn Disabil. 2008; 41(1):67-84. DOI: 10.1177/0022219407310838. View