» Articles » PMID: 37680211

A Cross-institutional Evaluation on Breast Cancer Phenotyping NLP Algorithms on Electronic Health Records

Overview
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2023 Sep 8
PMID 37680211
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Transformer-based language models are prevailing in the clinical domain due to their excellent performance on clinical NLP tasks. The generalizability of those models is usually ignored during the model development process. This study evaluated the generalizability of CancerBERT, a Transformer-based clinical NLP model, along with classic machine learning models, i.e., conditional random field (CRF), bi-directional long short-term memory CRF (BiLSTM-CRF), across different clinical institutes through a breast cancer phenotype extraction task.

Materials And Methods: Two clinical corpora of breast cancer patients were collected from the electronic health records from the University of Minnesota (UMN) and Mayo Clinic (MC), and annotated following the same guideline. We developed three types of NLP models (i.e., CRF, BiLSTM-CRF and CancerBERT) to extract cancer phenotypes from clinical texts. We evaluated the generalizability of models on different test sets with different learning strategies (model transfer vs locally trained). The entity coverage score was assessed with their association with the model performances.

Results: We manually annotated 200 and 161 clinical documents at UMN and MC. The corpora of the two institutes were found to have higher similarity between the target entities than the overall corpora. The CancerBERT models obtained the best performances among the independent test sets from two clinical institutes and the permutation test set. The CancerBERT model developed in one institute and further fine-tuned in another institute achieved reasonable performance compared to the model developed on local data (micro-F1: 0.925 vs 0.932).

Conclusions: The results indicate the CancerBERT model has superior learning ability and generalizability among the three types of clinical NLP models for our named entity recognition task. It has the advantage to recognize complex entities, e.g., entities with different labels.

Citing Articles

Health Care Language Models and Their Fine-Tuning for Information Extraction: Scoping Review.

Nunes M, Bone J, Ferreira J, Elvas L JMIR Med Inform. 2024; 12:e60164.

PMID: 39432345 PMC: 11535799. DOI: 10.2196/60164.


A taxonomy for advancing systematic error analysis in multi-site electronic health record-based clinical concept extraction.

Fu S, Wang L, He H, Wen A, Zong N, Kumari A J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024; 31(7):1493-1502.

PMID: 38742455 PMC: 11187420. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocae101.

References
1.
Khambete M, Su W, Garcia J, Badgeley M . Quantification of BERT Diagnosis Generalizability Across Medical Specialties Using Semantic Dataset Distance. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2021; 2021:345-354. PMC: 8378651. View

2.
Digan W, Neveol A, Neuraz A, Wack M, Baudoin D, Burgun A . Can reproducibility be improved in clinical natural language processing? A study of 7 clinical NLP suites. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020; 28(3):504-515. PMC: 7936396. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa261. View

3.
Coquet J, Bozkurt S, Kan K, Ferrari M, Blayney D, Brooks J . Comparison of orthogonal NLP methods for clinical phenotyping and assessment of bone scan utilization among prostate cancer patients. J Biomed Inform. 2019; 94:103184. PMC: 6584041. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103184. View

4.
Zhou S, Wang N, Wang L, Liu H, Zhang R . CancerBERT: a cancer domain-specific language model for extracting breast cancer phenotypes from electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022; 29(7):1208-1216. PMC: 9196678. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocac040. View

5.
Armstrong R . When to use the Bonferroni correction. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014; 34(5):502-8. DOI: 10.1111/opo.12131. View