» Articles » PMID: 37678613

Two Interventions on Pathologic Nodal Staging in a Population-Based Lung Cancer Resection Cohort

Abstract

Background: Despite its prognostic importance, poor pathologic nodal staging of lung cancer prevails. We evaluated the impact of 2 interventions to improve pathologic nodal staging.

Methods: We implemented a lymph node specimen collection kit to improve intraoperative lymph node collection (surgical intervention) and a novel gross dissection method for intrapulmonary node retrieval (pathology intervention) in nonrandomized stepped-wedge fashion, involving 12 hospitals and 7 pathology groups. We used standard statistical methods to compare surgical quality and survival of patients who had neither intervention (group 1), pathology intervention only (group 2), surgical intervention only (group 3), and both interventions (group 4).

Results: Of 4019 patients from 2009 to 2021, 50%, 5%, 21%, and 24%, respectively, were in groups 1 to 4. Rates of nonexamination of lymph nodes were 11%, 9%, 0%, and 0% and rates of nonexamination of mediastinal lymph nodes were 29%, 35%, 2%, and 2%, respectively, in groups 1 to 4 (P < .0001). Rates of attainment of American College of Surgeons Operative Standard 5.8 were 22%, 29%, 72%, and 85%; and rates of International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer complete resection were 14%, 21%, 53%, and 61% (P < .0001). Compared with group 1, adjusted hazard ratios for death were as follows: group 2, 0.93 (95% CI, 0.76-1.15); group 3, 0.91 (0.78-1.03); and group 4, 0.75 (0.64-0.87). Compared with group 2, group 4 adjusted hazard ratio was 0.72 (0.57-0.91); compared with group 3, it was 0.83 (0.69-0.99). These relationships remained after exclusion of wedge resections.

Conclusions: Combining a lymph node collection kit with a novel gross dissection method significantly improved pathologic nodal evaluation and survival.

Citing Articles

Standardized intrapulmonary lymph node dissection in lung cancer specimens: A national Colombian analysis.

Mantilla Gaviria H, Martinez Jaramillo S, Carvajal Fierro C, Zapata Gonzalez R, Montoya Medina C, Garcia-Herreros Hellal L JTCVS Open. 2024; 20:174-182.

PMID: 39296460 PMC: 11405979. DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.06.004.

References
1.
Felip E, Altorki N, Zhou C, Csoszi T, Vynnychenko I, Goloborodko O . Adjuvant atezolizumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in resected stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (IMpower010): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021; 398(10308):1344-1357. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02098-5. View

2.
Kehl K, Zahrieh D, Yang P, Hillman S, Tan A, Sands J . Rates of Guideline-Concordant Surgery and Adjuvant Chemotherapy Among Patients With Early-Stage Lung Cancer in the US ALCHEMIST Study (Alliance A151216). JAMA Oncol. 2022; 8(5):717-728. PMC: 8931674. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.0039. View

3.
Smeltzer M, Lee Y, Faris M Div N, Fehnel C, Akinbobola O, Meadows-Taylor M . Trends in Accuracy and Comprehensiveness of Pathology Reports for Resected NSCLC in a High Mortality Area of the United States. J Thorac Oncol. 2021; 16(10):1663-1671. PMC: 9039869. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.06.027. View

4.
Butnor K, Asamura H, Travis W . Node Doubt: Rigorous Surgical Nodal Procurement Combined With Thorough Pathologic Evaluation Improves Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Staging Accuracy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016; 102(2):353-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.05.075. View

5.
Wu Y, Tsuboi M, He J, John T, Grohe C, Majem M . Osimertinib in Resected -Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020; 383(18):1711-1723. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2027071. View