» Articles » PMID: 37675452

Subphenotypes of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Advancing Towards Precision Medicine

Overview
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2023 Sep 7
PMID 37675452
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common cause of severe hypoxemia defined by the acute onset of bilateral non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema. The diagnosis is made by defined consensus criteria. Supportive care, including prevention of further injury to the lungs, is the only treatment that conclusively improves outcomes. The inability to find more advanced therapies is due, in part, to the highly sensitive but relatively non-specific current syndromic consensus criteria, combining a heterogenous population of patients under the umbrella of ARDS. With few effective therapies, the morality rate remains 30% to 40%. Many subphenotypes of ARDS have been proposed to cluster patients with shared combinations of observable or measurable traits. Subphenotyping patients is a strategy to overcome heterogeneity to advance clinical research and eventually identify treatable traits. Subphenotypes of ARDS have been proposed based on radiographic patterns, protein biomarkers, transcriptomics, and/or machine-based clustering of clinical and biological variables. Some of these strategies have been reproducible across patient cohorts, but at present all have practical limitations to their implementation. Furthermore, there is no agreement on which strategy is the most appropriate. This review will discuss the current strategies for subphenotyping patients with ARDS, including the strengths and limitations, and the future directions of ARDS subphenotyping.

Citing Articles

Highlights from the Respiratory Failure and Mechanical Ventilation Conference 2024.

Bianquis C, De Leo G, Morana G, Duarte-Silva M, Nolasco S, Vilde R Breathe (Sheff). 2024; 20(3):240105.

PMID: 39534488 PMC: 11555592. DOI: 10.1183/20734735.0105-2024.


Integrating hot topics and implementation of treatable traits in asthma.

Gibson P, McDonald V Eur Respir J. 2024; 64(6).

PMID: 39255992 PMC: 11618818. DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00861-2024.

References
1.
Meyer N, Gattinoni L, Calfee C . Acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet. 2021; 398(10300):622-637. PMC: 8248927. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00439-6. View

2.
Brower R, Matthay M, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson B, Wheeler A . Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342(18):1301-8. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801. View

3.
Antcliffe D, Burnham K, Al-Beidh F, Santhakumaran S, Brett S, Hinds C . Transcriptomic Signatures in Sepsis and a Differential Response to Steroids. From the VANISH Randomized Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018; 199(8):980-986. PMC: 6467319. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201807-1419OC. View

4.
Sinha P, Delucchi K, McAuley D, OKane C, Matthay M, Calfee C . Development and validation of parsimonious algorithms to classify acute respiratory distress syndrome phenotypes: a secondary analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Respir Med. 2020; 8(3):247-257. PMC: 7543720. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30369-8. View

5.
Brower R, Lanken P, MacIntyre N, Matthay M, Morris A, Ancukiewicz M . Higher versus lower positive end-expiratory pressures in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351(4):327-36. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa032193. View