» Articles » PMID: 37671947

Comprehensive Analysis and Experimental Validation Reveal Elevated CLCN4 is a Promising Biomarker in Endometrial Cancer

Overview
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2023 Sep 6
PMID 37671947
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Several studies have reported the role of CLCN4 in tumor progression. However, its mechanism remains to be thoroughly studied. The objective of this study was to explore the potential pathogenic role of CLCN4 in endometrial carcinoma (UCEC) with a better understanding of the pathological mechanisms involved. The potential roles of CLCN4 in different tumors were explored based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), the expression difference, mutation, survival, pathological stage, Immunity subtypes, Immune infiltration, tumor microenvironment (TME), tumor mutation burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI), mismatch repair (MMR) related to CLCN4 were analyzed. Then, the expression, prognosis, mutation, and functional enrichment of CLCN4 in UCEC were analyzed. Immunohistochemical experiment was used to verify the expression of CLCN4 in endometrial cancer tissues and normal tissues. , we knocked down of CLCN4 in HEC-1-A cells and performed CCK8, WB, RT-PCR, wound-healing, transwell assays to further validation of the molecular function. Results revealed that high expression of CLCN4 was observed in 20 cancer types of TCGA. CLCN4 expression correlates with poor survival in MESO, BLCA, THCA, especially UCEC tumors. CLCN4 expression was significantly associated with CD4+ T-cell infiltration, especially CD4+ Th1-cell. Immunohistochemical experiment reveals that CLCN4 is high expressed in endometrial tumors, experiment reveals that knockdown of CLCN4 inhibits the cells proliferation, migration and invasion. Our study is the first to offer a comprehensive understanding of the oncogenic roles of CLCN4 on different tumors. CLCN4 may become a potential biomarker in UCEC.

Citing Articles

Tissue factor pathway inhibitor 2 as a serum biomarker for endometrial cancer: a single-center retrospective study.

Uomoto M, Ota Y, Suzuki Y, Yumori A, Narimatsu H, Koizume S BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):1058.

PMID: 39192208 PMC: 11351603. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12827-0.

References
1.
Lloyd S, Pearce S, Fisher S, Steinmeyer K, Schwappach B, Scheinman S . A common molecular basis for three inherited kidney stone diseases. Nature. 1996; 379(6564):445-9. DOI: 10.1038/379445a0. View

2.
Suemori T, Susumu N, Iwata T, Banno K, Yamagami W, Hirasawa A . Intratumoral CD8+ Lymphocyte Infiltration as a Prognostic Factor and Its Relationship With Cyclooxygenase 2 Expression and Microsatellite Instability in Endometrial Cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015; 25(7):1165-72. DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000482. View

3.
Meiser B, Kaur R, Kirk J, Morrow A, Peate M, Wong W . Evaluation of implementation of risk management guidelines for carriers of pathogenic variants in mismatch repair genes: a nationwide audit of familial cancer clinics. Fam Cancer. 2020; 19(4):337-346. DOI: 10.1007/s10689-020-00183-4. View

4.
Steinberg B, Huynh K, Brodovitch A, Jabs S, Stauber T, Jentsch T . A cation counterflux supports lysosomal acidification. J Cell Biol. 2010; 189(7):1171-86. PMC: 2894458. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200911083. View

5.
Zhou P, He N, Zhang J, Lin Z, Wang J, Yan L . Novel mutations and phenotypes of epilepsy-associated genes in epileptic encephalopathies. Genes Brain Behav. 2018; 17(8):e12456. DOI: 10.1111/gbb.12456. View