» Articles » PMID: 37670545

The Validity and Applicability of the Revised Delirium Rating Scale (DRS-R98) for Delirium Severity Assessment in a Critical Care Setting

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2023 Sep 6
PMID 37670545
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Delirium is a neuropsychiatric syndrome common in critical illness. Worsening delirium severity is associated with poorer clinical outcomes, yet its assessment remains under-reported with most severity assessment tools not validated for critical care. The DRS-R98 is a widely applied and validated tool. The aim of this project is to report the validation and utility of the DRS-R98 in critical illness.

Methods: This prospective, cohort study was conducted in adults with delirium admitted to a critical care unit and predicted to stay for ≥ 24 h. We excluded patients with severe neurological or communication barriers that would have interfered with the DRS-R98 assessment. Patients were screened using a delirium detection algorithm and the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit. Eligible patient informations were collected and reported to qualified assessor/s before visiting clinical areas, confirming delirium presence and undertaking DRS- R98 assessments. To assess the tool's construct validity, an intensivist completed the Clinical Global Impression-Scale (CGI-S). To calculate the inter-rater reliability (IRR) a subset of patients were simultaneously evaluated by two assessors.

Results: We assessed 22 patients, 73% were male, with a median age of 65 years (IQR14). The DRS -R98 mean (SD) severity score was 24 (+/-7.7), total scale was 29 (+/18.0), and CGI-S 3.5 (+/11.5). Assessment duration was 90 min (+/-55) and 15 min (+/-5) for record data extraction and clinical assessment respectively. The CGI-S significantly correlated with DRS-R98 severity (r = 0.626) and total (r = 0.628) scales. The DRS-R98 Cronbach's alpha was 0.896 for severity scale and 0.886 for total scale. The inter-rater reliability (IRR) was assessed in six patients and reported an inter-correlation coefficient of 0.505 (p = 0.124) and 0.565 (p = 0.93) for the severity and total scale respectively.

Conclusions: In critical care, the Delirium Rating Scale R98 had good construct validity, excellent internal consistency, and moderate inter-rater reliability.

Citing Articles

Patient Outcomes and Management Strategies for Intensive Care Unit (ICU)-Associated Delirium: A Literature Review.

Abdelbaky A, Eldelpshany M Cureus. 2024; 16(6):e61527.

PMID: 38957260 PMC: 11218465. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.61527.

References
1.
Lee K, Won W, Lee H, Kweon Y, Lee C, Pae C . Amisulpride versus quetiapine for the treatment of delirium: a randomized, open prospective study. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2005; 20(6):311-4. DOI: 10.1097/00004850-200511000-00005. View

2.
Grover S, Agarwal M, Sharma A, Mattoo S, Avasthi A, Chakrabarti S . Symptoms and aetiology of delirium: a comparison of elderly and adult patients. East Asian Arch Psychiatry. 2013; 23(2):56-64. View

3.
Mouzopoulos G, Vasiliadis G, Lasanianos N, Nikolaras G, Morakis E, Kaminaris M . Fascia iliaca block prophylaxis for hip fracture patients at risk for delirium: a randomized placebo-controlled study. J Orthop Traumatol. 2009; 10(3):127-33. PMC: 2744739. DOI: 10.1007/s10195-009-0062-6. View

4.
Jones R, Cizginer S, Pavlech L, Albuquerque A, Daiello L, Dharmarajan K . Assessment of Instruments for Measurement of Delirium Severity: A Systematic Review. JAMA Intern Med. 2018; 179(2):231-239. PMC: 6382582. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6975. View

5.
Lee Y, Ryu J, Lee J, Kim H, Shin I, Kim J . Korean version of the delirium rating scale-revised-98: reliability and validity. Psychiatry Investig. 2011; 8(1):30-8. PMC: 3079183. DOI: 10.4306/pi.2011.8.1.30. View