» Articles » PMID: 37668666

Testing the Real-World Accuracy of the Dexcom G6 Pro CGM During the Insulin-Only Bionic Pancreas Pivotal Trial

Overview
Date 2023 Sep 5
PMID 37668666
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) have transformed the way people with type 1 diabetes can self-monitor glucose levels. Past studies have evaluated the accuracy of CGMs in clinic-based studies, but few have analyzed their accuracy in real-world settings. The Insulin-Only Bionic Pancreas Trial provided the opportunity to assess real-world accuracy of the blinded Dexcom G6 Pro sensor over the first 48-60 h of wear using a blood glucose meter (BGM) as a comparator for 1073 CGM-BGM pairs across 53 participants. The mean absolute relative difference (MARD) was 11.0% over a median period of 50 h (range 47-79 h). The MARD was 13.6% in the first 12 h, 10.5% in hours 12-24, and 10.1% after the first 24 h. These results are comparable with accuracy shown previously with laboratory-based measurements and provide real-world evidence of Dexcom G6 Pro accuracy, which improved after the first 12 h and then remained stable thereafter. Clinical Trial Registry: clinicaltrials.gov; NCT04200313.

Citing Articles

Accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring in the hospital setting: an observational study.

OConnor M, Flint K, Sabean A, Ashley A, Zheng H, Yan J Diabetologia. 2024; 67(12):2650-2659.

PMID: 39126488 DOI: 10.1007/s00125-024-06250-0.


Accuracy and Feasibility of a Novel Glucose/Lactate Continuous Multi-Analyte Sensing Platform in Humans.

Lu J, Morrison D, Halim B, Manos G, Obeyesekere V, Kannard B J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024; :19322968241266822.

PMID: 39075942 PMC: 11571936. DOI: 10.1177/19322968241266822.

References
1.
Moser O, Sternad C, Eckstein M, Szadkowska A, Michalak A, Mader J . Performance of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring systems in people with type 1 diabetes: A pooled analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021; 24(3):522-529. DOI: 10.1111/dom.14609. View

2.
Jafri R, Balliro C, El-Khatib F, Maheno M, Hillard M, ODonovan A . A Three-Way Accuracy Comparison of the Dexcom G5, Abbott Freestyle Libre Pro, and Senseonics Eversense Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices in a Home-Use Study of Subjects with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020; 22(11):846-852. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2019.0449. View

3.
Wadwa R, Laffel L, Shah V, Garg S . Accuracy of a Factory-Calibrated, Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System During 10 Days of Use in Youth and Adults with Diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018; 20(6):395-402. PMC: 6110124. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2018.0150. View

4.
Welsh J, Psavko S, Zhang X, Gao P, Balo A . Comparisons of Fifth-, Sixth-, and Seventh-Generation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022; 18(1):143-147. PMC: 10899839. DOI: 10.1177/19322968221099879. View

5.
Link M, Kamecke U, Waldenmaier D, Pleus S, Garcia A, Haug C . Comparative Accuracy Analysis of a Real-time and an Intermittent-Scanning Continuous Glucose Monitoring System. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019; 15(2):287-293. PMC: 8256076. DOI: 10.1177/1932296819895022. View