» Articles » PMID: 37668300

Acute and Long-Term Consequences of Co-opted Doublesex on the Development of Mimetic Butterfly Color Patterns

Overview
Journal Mol Biol Evol
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 Sep 5
PMID 37668300
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Novel phenotypes are increasingly recognized to have evolved by co-option of conserved genes into new developmental contexts, yet the process by which co-opted genes modify existing developmental programs remains obscure. Here, we provide insight into this process by characterizing the role of co-opted doublesex in butterfly wing color pattern development. dsx is the master regulator of insect sex differentiation but has been co-opted to control the switch between discrete nonmimetic and mimetic patterns in Papilio alphenor and its relatives through the evolution of novel mimetic alleles. We found dynamic spatial and temporal expression pattern differences between mimetic and nonmimetic butterflies throughout wing development. A mimetic color pattern program is switched on by a pulse of dsx expression in early pupal development that causes acute and long-term differential gene expression, particularly in Wnt and Hedgehog signaling pathways. RNAi suggested opposing, novel roles for these pathways in mimetic pattern development. Importantly, Dsx co-option caused Engrailed, a primary target of Hedgehog signaling, to gain a novel expression domain early in pupal wing development that is propagated through mid-pupal development to specify novel mimetic patterns despite becoming decoupled from Dsx expression itself. Altogether, our findings provide multiple views into how co-opted genes can both cause and elicit changes to conserved networks and pathways to result in development of novel, adaptive phenotypes.

Citing Articles

Supergene evolution via gain of autoregulation.

VanKuren N, Sheikh S, Fu C, Massardo D, Lu W, Kronforst M bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38260248 PMC: 10802445. DOI: 10.1101/2024.01.09.574839.


Frizzled2 receives WntA signaling during butterfly wing pattern formation.

Hanly J, Loh L, Mazo-Vargas A, Rivera-Miranda T, Livraghi L, Tendolkar A Development. 2023; 150(18).

PMID: 37602496 PMC: 10560568. DOI: 10.1242/dev.201868.

References
1.
Iijima T, Yoda S, Fujiwara H . The mimetic wing pattern of butterflies is regulated by a -orchestrated gene network. Commun Biol. 2019; 2:257. PMC: 6620351. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-019-0510-7. View

2.
Jiggins C, Wallbank R, Hanly J . Waiting in the wings: what can we learn about gene co-option from the diversification of butterfly wing patterns?. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016; 372(1713). PMC: 5182417. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0485. View

3.
Kunte K, Zhang W, Tenger-Trolander A, Palmer D, Martin A, Reed R . doublesex is a mimicry supergene. Nature. 2014; 507(7491):229-32. DOI: 10.1038/nature13112. View

4.
Conesa A, Nueda M, Ferrer A, Talon M . maSigPro: a method to identify significantly differential expression profiles in time-course microarray experiments. Bioinformatics. 2006; 22(9):1096-102. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl056. View

5.
Martin A, Reed R . Wnt signaling underlies evolution and development of the butterfly wing pattern symmetry systems. Dev Biol. 2014; 395(2):367-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.08.031. View