» Articles » PMID: 37666974

Functional Conservation of Microbial Communities Determines Composition Predictability in Anaerobic Digestion

Overview
Journal ISME J
Date 2023 Sep 4
PMID 37666974
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A major challenge in managing and engineering microbial communities is determining whether and how microbial community responses to environmental alterations can be predicted and explained, especially in microorganism-driven systems. We addressed this challenge by monitoring microbial community responses to the periodic addition of the same feedstock throughout anaerobic digestion, a typical microorganism-driven system where microorganisms degrade and transform the feedstock. The immediate and delayed response consortia were assemblages of microorganisms whose abundances significantly increased on the first or third day after feedstock addition. The immediate response consortia were more predictable than the delayed response consortia and showed a reproducible and predictable order-level composition across multiple feedstock additions. These results stood in both present (16 S rRNA gene) and potentially active (16 S rRNA) microbial communities and in different feedstocks with different biodegradability and were validated by simulation modeling. Despite substantial species variability, the immediate response consortia aligned well with the reproducible CH production, which was attributed to the conservation of expressed functions by the response consortia throughout anaerobic digestion, based on metatranscriptomic data analyses. The high species variability might be attributed to intraspecific competition and contribute to biodiversity maintenance and functional redundancy. Our results demonstrate reproducible and predictable microbial community responses and their importance in stabilizing system functions.

References
1.
Coyte K, Schluter J, Foster K . The ecology of the microbiome: Networks, competition, and stability. Science. 2015; 350(6261):663-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.aad2602. View

2.
Lin Q, Dini-Andreote F, Meador T, Angel R, Meszarosova L, Hedenec P . Microbial phylogenetic relatedness links to distinct successional patterns of bacterial and fungal communities. Environ Microbiol. 2022; 24(9):3985-4000. DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.15936. View

3.
Caporaso J, Lauber C, Walters W, Berg-Lyons D, Huntley J, Fierer N . Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J. 2012; 6(8):1621-4. PMC: 3400413. DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2012.8. View

4.
Poirier S, Bize A, Bureau C, Bouchez T, Chapleur O . Community shifts within anaerobic digestion microbiota facing phenol inhibition: Towards early warning microbial indicators?. Water Res. 2016; 100:296-305. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.05.041. View

5.
Edgar R . Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010; 26(19):2460-1. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461. View