Use of Locked Plates and Mono-rail Fixator in Segmental Tibial Defects: A Prospective Interventional Study

Overview

Journal J Orthop

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2023 Sep 4

PMID 37664557

Authors

Bom Bahadur Kunwar

Vikas Maheshwari

Mohit Dhingra

Saroj Bhagat

Chanakya Pv

Sunit Vardhan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: The management of gap non-union is a major challenge to both the clinician and the patient as it is technically difficult, time-intensive, and physically arduous for the patient along with an unpredictable result. Gap non-union can arise from extrusion of bony fragment at the time of trauma or after debridement of unhealthy bone later. Moreover, Tibia because of its subcutaneous anatomy can easily undergo bone-loss and segmental defect. Among various methods available for managing gap non-union of tibia distraction osteogenesis using either ilizarov fixator or mono-rail fixator is the most popular one. Here we present functional and bony outcomes of combined use of locking plate and Limb Reconstruction System (LRS) in tibial gap non-union and assess whether it decreases fixator time and related complications.

Patients And Methods: A prospective intervention study constituting 10 patients with Paley's type B1 tibial gap non-union over a period of 22months. In first stage, debridement was done; tibial locking plate and mono-rail fixator were applied along with corticomy at proximal tibia. Distraction was started 7-14 days later. At the end of distraction phase, fixator was removed and transported segment was fixed with screws with or without bone grafting at docking site. Patients were followed up every 6 weeks for radiological and clinical assessment. Functional assessment using Application for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) functional score, and Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS) functional score while bone outcome was assessed with ASAMI bone score. Quality of regenerate was assessed by Fernandez-Esteve grading. Detailed scoring was done at the time of index surgery, at the time of LRS removal and at the time of consolidation phase.

Results: All the 10 patients were male with mean age of 33 years. The mean defect size was 4.94 cm after debridement. Minimum duration of follow up was 30 weeks after removal of LRS. Mean duration between trauma and inclusion in the study was 17.7 months. The median external fixator index was 15.63 days/cm. The complication rate was 1.3/patient. According to Paley's classification, there were eleven problems and two obstacles, and no true complications. Both ASAMI bone score and functional scores were excellent in three and good in six patients. The median MSTS composite score was 76.66%.

Conclusion: The integrated fixation is an effective and satisfactory method enabling early external fixator removal with low rate of complication. So, this technique can be recommended for the management of segmental tibial defects.

Level Of Evidence: II.

References

Oh C, Apivatthakakul T, Oh J, Kim J, Lee H, Kyung H . Bone transport with an external fixator and a locking plate for segmental tibial defects. Bone Joint J. 2013; 95-B(12):1667-72. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B12.31507. View

Chen X, Zhang W, Yu Z, Wang Y, Zhang S, Song T . [Application of bone transport with unilateral external fixator combined with locked plate internal fixation in treatment of infected tibial nonunion]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019; 33(3):328-331. PMC: 8337918. DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.201811024. View

Kim S, Mandar A, Song S, Song H . Pitfalls of lengthening over an intramedullary nail in tibia: a consecutive case series. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011; 132(2):185-91. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-011-1411-5. View

Yin P, Zhang Q, Mao Z, Li T, Zhang L, Tang P . The treatment of infected tibial nonunion by bone transport using the Ilizarov external fixator and a systematic review of infected tibial nonunion treated by Ilizarov methods. Acta Orthop Belg. 2015; 80(3):426-35. View

Jilani L, Shaan Z, Ranjan R, Faizan M, Ahmad S, Asif N . Management of complex non union of tibia using rail external fixator. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020; 11(Suppl 4):S578-S584. PMC: 7394815. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.12.016. View

Sen C, Eralp L, Gunes T, Erdem M, Ozden V, Kocaoglu M . An alternative method for the treatment of nonunion of the tibia with bone loss. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88(6):783-9. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B6.17515. View

Fenton P, Bose D . Patient-reported outcomes following treatment of tibial non-union with circular frames. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2014; 9(1):33-5. PMC: 3951624. DOI: 10.1007/s11751-014-0187-x. View

Feltri P, Solaro L, Di Martino A, Candrian C, Errani C, Filardo G . Union, complication, reintervention and failure rates of surgical techniques for large diaphyseal defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):9098. PMC: 9160061. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-12140-5. View

Keating J, Simpson A, Robinson C . The management of fractures with bone loss. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005; 87(2):142-50. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.87b2.15874. View

10.

Bernstein M, Fragomen A, Sabharwal S, Barclay J, Rozbruch S . Does Integrated Fixation Provide Benefit in the Reconstruction of Posttraumatic Tibial Bone Defects?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015; 473(10):3143-53. PMC: 4562932. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-015-4326-6. View

11.

ENNEKING W, Dunham W, Gebhardt M, Malawar M, Pritchard D . A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993; (286):241-6. View

12.

Papakostidis C, Bhandari M, Giannoudis P . Distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of long bone defects of the lower limbs: effectiveness, complications and clinical results; a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Joint J. 2013; 95-B(12):1673-80. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B12.32385. View

13.

Ozaki T, Hillmann A, Wuisman P, Winkelmann W . Reconstruction of tibia by ipsilateral vascularized fibula and allograft. 12 cases with malignant bone tumors. Acta Orthop Scand. 1997; 68(3):298-301. DOI: 10.3109/17453679708996706. View

14.

Cunningham B, Brazina S, Morshed S, Miclau 3rd T . Fracture healing: A review of clinical, imaging and laboratory diagnostic options. Injury. 2017; 48 Suppl 1:S69-S75. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.020. View

15.

McNally M, Ferguson J, Kugan R, Stubbs D . Ilizarov Treatment Protocols in the Management of Infected Nonunion of the Tibia. J Orthop Trauma. 2017; 31 Suppl 5:S47-S54. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000987. View

16.

Huntington T . VI. Case of Bone Transference: Use of a Segment of Fibula to Supply a Defect in the Tibia. Ann Surg. 1905; 41(2):249-51. PMC: 1425793. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-190502000-00006. View

17.

Kristiansen L, Steen H . Lengthening of the tibia over an intramedullary nail, using the Ilizarov external fixator. Major complications and slow consolidation in 9 lengthenings. Acta Orthop Scand. 1999; 70(3):271-4. DOI: 10.3109/17453679908997806. View

18.

Gupta S, Malhotra A, Mittal N, Garg S, Jindal R, Kansay R . The management of infected nonunion of tibia with a segmental defect using simultaneous fixation with a monorail fixator and a locked plate. Bone Joint J. 2018; 100-B(8):1094-1099. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B8.BJJ-2017-1442.R1. View

19.

Hatzokos I, Stavridis S, Iosifidou E, Karataglis D, Christodoulou A . Autologous bone marrow grafting combined with demineralized bone matrix improves consolidation of docking site after distraction osteogenesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93(7):671-8. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00514. View

20.

Ahmad Khan R, Maqbool M, Yasin A . Effectiveness of ilizarov frame fixation on functional outcome in aseptic tibial gap non-union. J Pak Med Assoc. 2016; 65(11 Suppl 3):S179-85. View