» Articles » PMID: 37663338

An Intersectional Lens on Young Leaders: Bias Toward Young Women and Young Men in Leadership Positions

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2023 Sep 4
PMID 37663338
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Research has recognized age biases against young leaders, yet understanding of how gender, the most frequently studied demographic leader characteristic, influences this bias remains limited. In this study, we examine the gender-specific age bias toward young female and young male leaders through an intersectional lens. By integrating intersectionality theory with insights on status beliefs associated with age and gender, we test whether young female and male leaders face an interactive rather than an additive form of bias. We conducted two preregistered experimental studies ( = 918 and = 985), where participants evaluated leaders based on age, gender, or a combination of both. Our analysis reveals a negative age bias in leader status ascriptions toward young leaders compared to middle-aged and older leaders. This bias persists when gender information is added, as demonstrated in both intersectional categories of young female and young male leaders. This bias pattern does not extend to middle-aged or older female and male leaders, thereby supporting the age bias against young leaders specifically. Interestingly, we also examined whether social dominance orientation strengthens the bias against young (male) leaders, but our results (reported in the SOM) are not as hypothesized. In sum, our results emphasize the importance of young age as a crucial demographic characteristic in leadership perceptions that can even overshadow the role of gender.

Citing Articles

Becoming Leaders - A Qualitative Research Study on the Priorities and Concerns of Early Career Women Faculty in Academic Medicine.

Liu O, Grieb S, Halsey J, Levine R, Oliva-Hemker M, Lee J J Healthc Leadersh. 2024; 16:511-523.

PMID: 39649702 PMC: 11624522. DOI: 10.2147/JHL.S499001.


Servant versus directive leadership and promotability: does leader gender matter?.

Barthel A, Buengeler C Front Psychol. 2023; 14:957121.

PMID: 38146402 PMC: 10749661. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.957121.

References
1.
Hester N, Payne K, Brown-Iannuzzi J, Gray K . On Intersectionality: How Complex Patterns of Discrimination Can Emerge From Simple Stereotypes. Psychol Sci. 2020; 31(8):1013-1024. DOI: 10.1177/0956797620929979. View

2.
Eagly A, Nater C, Miller D, Kaufmann M, Sczesny S . Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018. Am Psychol. 2019; 75(3):301-315. DOI: 10.1037/amp0000494. View

3.
Homan A, Buengeler C, Eckhoff R, van Ginkel W, Voelpel S . The interplay of diversity training and diversity beliefs on team creativity in nationality diverse teams. J Appl Psychol. 2015; 100(5):1456-67. DOI: 10.1037/apl0000013. View

4.
Petsko C, Rosette A . Are leaders still presumed white by default? Racial bias in leader categorization revisited. J Appl Psychol. 2022; 108(2):330-340. DOI: 10.1037/apl0001020. View

5.
Schein V . The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. J Appl Psychol. 1973; 57(2):95-100. DOI: 10.1037/h0037128. View