» Articles » PMID: 37662359

Disrupted Excitation-inhibition Balance in Cognitively Normal Individuals at Risk of Alzheimer's Disease

Overview
Journal bioRxiv
Date 2023 Sep 4
PMID 37662359
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Sex differences impact Alzheimer's disease (AD) neuropathology, but cell-to-network level dysfunctions in the prodromal phase are unclear. Alterations in hippocampal excitation-inhibition balance (EIB) have recently been linked to early AD pathology.

Objective: Examine how AD risk factors (age, APOE-ɛ4, amyloid-β) relate to hippocampal EIB in cognitively normal males and females using connectome-level measures.

Methods: Individuals from the OASIS-3 cohort (age 42-95) were studied (N = 437), with a subset aged 65+ undergoing neuropsychological testing (N = 231).

Results: In absence of AD risk factors (APOE-ɛ4/Aβ+), whole-brain EIB decreases with age more significantly in males than females (p = 0.021, β = -0.007). Regression modeling including APOE-ɛ4 allele carriers (Aβ-) yielded a significant positive AGE-by-APOE interaction in the right hippocampus for females only (p = 0.013, β = 0.014), persisting with inclusion of Aβ+ individuals (p = 0.012, β = 0.014). Partial correlation analyses of neuropsychological testing showed significant associations with EIB in females: positive correlations between right hippocampal EIB with categorical fluency and whole-brain EIB with the trail-making test (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Sex differences in EIB emerge during normal aging and progresses differently with AD risk. Results suggest APOE-ɛ4 disrupts hippocampal balance more than amyloid in females. Increased excitation correlates positively with neuropsychological performance in the female group, suggesting a duality in terms of potential beneficial effects prior to cognitive impairment. This underscores the translational relevance of APOE-ɛ4 related hyperexcitation in females, potentially informing therapeutic targets or early interventions to mitigate AD progression in this vulnerable population.

References
1.
Altmann A, Tian L, Henderson V, Greicius M . Sex modifies the APOE-related risk of developing Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol. 2014; 75(4):563-73. PMC: 4117990. DOI: 10.1002/ana.24135. View

2.
Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N . Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage. 2002; 15(1):273-89. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0978. View

3.
Sen A, Akinola M, Tai X, Symmonds M, Jones G, Mura S . An Investigation of Levetiracetam in Alzheimer's Disease (ILiAD): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised crossover proof of concept study. Trials. 2021; 22(1):508. PMC: 8325256. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05404-4. View

4.
Cotelli M, Calabria M, Manenti R, Rosini S, Zanetti O, Cappa S . Improved language performance in Alzheimer disease following brain stimulation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010; 82(7):794-7. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.197848. View

5.
Morris J . The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology. 1993; 43(11):2412-4. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.43.11.2412-a. View