» Articles » PMID: 37654430

Treatment Pattern and Health Care Resource Utilization for Taiwanese Patients with Migraine: a Population-based Study

Overview
Journal Front Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2023 Sep 1
PMID 37654430
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Given the substantial disease burden, appropriate and effective management of migraine is a public health priority. To gain insights into real-world migraine management practices in Taiwan, current treatment patterns, costs, and health care resource use were assessed.

Methods: This was a retrospective, longitudinal study using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Included patients had an initial diagnosis of migraine (defined using International Classification of Diseases codes) between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2017. Data analyzed included demographics; the use, number, and type of acute and preventive medications; and drug and medical services costs. Data were stratified according to migraine type (chronic [CM] or episodic [EM] migraine).

Results: A total of 312,718 patients were included in the analyses: 53,992 (17.3%) had CM and 258,726 (82.7%) had EM. Most patients (81.7%) had used acute and/or preventive medications; acute medications used more frequently than preventive medications (78.0% vs. 20.2%). Acute medications were used by 81.6 and 77.3% of patients with CM and EM, respectively. Commonly used acute medications were acetaminophen (68.8%), ergots (49.4%), and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (38.4%); the use of triptans (6.0%), tramadol (3.1%), and other opioids (0.2%) was less common. A total of 28.6 and 18.5% of patients with CM and EM, respectively, used preventive medications. Flunarizine (68.9%), propranolol (40.7%), and topiramate (16.0%) were the most commonly used preventive medications. Most patients had used 1-2 acute or preventive medications, with the use of ≥3 acute or preventive medications more common in patients with CM than EM. Average total medical cost was 4,169 New Taiwan Dollars (NTDs) per CM patient and 2,928 NTDs per EM patient, with CM patients having higher costs associated with medical service utilization and acute medication use.

Conclusion: These real-world data suggest unmet needs for Taiwanese patients with migraine, including under-utilization of preventive medications and greater costs and health care resource use for patients with CM versus EM. These findings provide important information on treatment patterns, cost, and health care resource use for patients with migraine in Taiwan.

Citing Articles

Treatment Patterns and Persistence Among Patients Newly Diagnosed With Migraine in South Korea: A Retrospective Analysis of Health Claims Data.

Kim K, Ko H, Bea S, Lee H, Shin J, Chu M J Clin Neurol. 2024; 20(5):529-536.

PMID: 39227336 PMC: 11372211. DOI: 10.3988/jcn.2023.0485.


Network analysis of negative emotions in patients with episodic migraine: need for a multidisciplinary perspective.

Guerra F, Di Giacomo D, Ranieri J, Saporito G, Sucapane P, Totaro R Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1418188.

PMID: 39015320 PMC: 11249559. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1418188.


Unmet Needs of Patients Living with Migraine in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Countries.

Albilali A, Al-Hashel J, Elchami Z, Al Rukn S, Al Madani A, AlTunaiji M Pain Ther. 2024; 13(2):201-210.

PMID: 38280147 PMC: 10928050. DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00576-8.


Sex differences in the clinical manifestations related to dependence behaviors in medication-overuse headache.

Wang Y, Tzeng Y, Yu C, Ling Y, Chen S, Lai K J Headache Pain. 2023; 24(1):145.

PMID: 37907887 PMC: 10619252. DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01685-z.

References
1.
Vandervorst F, Van Deun L, Van Dycke A, Paemeleire K, Reuter U, Schoenen J . CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine: an efficacy and tolerability comparison with standard prophylactic drugs. J Headache Pain. 2021; 22(1):128. PMC: 8547103. DOI: 10.1186/s10194-021-01335-2. View

2.
. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017; 390(10100):1211-1259. PMC: 5605509. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32154-2. View

3.
Verspeelt J, De Locht P, Amery W . Post-marketing cohort study comparing the safety and efficacy of flunarizine and propranolol in the prophylaxis of migraine. Cephalalgia. 1996; 16(5):328-36; discussion 288. DOI: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1996.1605328.x. View

4.
Lipton R, Nicholson R, Reed M, Araujo A, Jaffe D, Faries D . Diagnosis, consultation, treatment, and impact of migraine in the US: Results of the OVERCOME (US) study. Headache. 2022; 62(2):122-140. PMC: 9305407. DOI: 10.1111/head.14259. View

5.
Lau C, Wang Y . 2022 Taiwan Guidelines for Acute Treatment of Migraine. Acta Neurol Taiwan. 2022; 31(2):89-113. View