Clinical Presentation, Outcomes, and Threshold for Repair by Sex in Degenerative Saccular Vs Fusiform Aneurysms in the Descending Thoracic Aorta

Overview

Journal J Vasc Surg

Publisher Elsevier

Specialties Cardiology & Vascular Diseases
General Surgery

Date 2023 Aug 31

PMID 37652142

Authors

Vinamr Rastogi

Camila R Guetter

Priya B Patel

Aderike C Anjorin

Christina L Marcaccio

Sai Divya Yadavalli

Salvatore T Scali

Adam W Beck

Hence J M Verhagen

Marc L Schermerhorn

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: Saccular-shaped thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) are often treated at smaller diameters compared with fusiform TAAs, despite a lack of strong clinical evidence to support this practice. The aim of this study was to examine differences in presentation, treatment, and outcomes between saccular TAAs and fusiform TAAs in the descending thoracic aorta. We also examined the need for sex-specific treatment thresholds for TAAs.

Methods: All Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) for degenerative TAAs in the descending thoracic aorta from 2012 through 2022 were reviewed. Patients were stratified by urgency: emergent/urgent vs elective repairs (ruptured/symptomatic). Demographics, comorbidities, anatomical/procedural characteristics, and outcomes for fusiform TAAs and saccular TAAs were compared. Cumulative distribution curves were used to plot the proportion of patients who underwent emergent/urgent repair according to sex-stratified aortic diameter.

Results: Among 655 emergent/urgent TEVARs, 37% were performed for saccular TAAs, whereas among 1352 elective TEVARs, 35% had saccular TAA morphology. Compared with fusiform TAAs, saccular TAAs more frequently underwent emergent/urgent (ruptured/symptomatic) TEVAR below the repair threshold in both females (<50 mm: 38% vs 10%; relative risk, 3.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.04-5.70; P < .001), and males (<55 mm: 47% vs 21%; relative risk, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.60-3.18; P < .001). Moreover, among patients with emergent/urgent fusiform TAAs, females presented at smaller diameters compared with males, whereas there was no difference in preoperative aneurysm diameter among patients with saccular TAAs. Regarding outcomes, emergent/urgent treated saccular TAAs had similar postoperative outcomes and 5-year mortality compared with fusiform TAAs. Nevertheless, in the elective cohort, patients with saccular TAAs had similar postoperative mortality compared with those with fusiform TAAs, but a lower rate of postoperative spinal cord ischemia (0.7% vs 3.2%; P = .010). Furthermore, patients with saccular TAAs had a higher rate of 5-year mortality compared with their fusiform counterparts (23% vs 17%; hazard ratio, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.12-2.10; P = .010).

Conclusions: Patients with saccular TAAs underwent emergent/urgent TEVAR at smaller diameters than those with fusiform TAAs, supporting current clinical practice guideline recommendations that saccular TAAs warrant treatment at smaller diameters. Furthermore, these data support a sex-specific treatment threshold for patients with fusiform TAAs, but not for those with saccular TAAs. Although there were no differences in outcomes following TEVAR between morphologies in the emergent/urgent cohort, patients with saccular TAAs who were treated electively were associated with higher 5-year mortality compared with those with fusiform TAAs.

Citing Articles

A hemodynamic analysis of energy loss in abdominal aortic aneurysm using three-dimension idealized model.

Wang L, Jiang X, Zhang K, Chen K, Wu P, Li X Front Physiol. 2024; 15:1330848.

PMID: 38312315 PMC: 10834748. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1330848.

References

Riambau V, Bockler D, Brunkwall J, Cao P, Chiesa R, Coppi G . Editor's Choice - Management of Descending Thoracic Aorta Diseases: Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017; 53(1):4-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.06.005. View

Lo R, Lu B, Fokkema M, Conrad M, Patel V, Fillinger M . Relative importance of aneurysm diameter and body size for predicting abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture in men and women. J Vasc Surg. 2014; 59(5):1209-16. PMC: 4004688. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.104. View

Inker L, Eneanya N, Coresh J, Tighiouart H, Wang D, Sang Y . New Creatinine- and Cystatin C-Based Equations to Estimate GFR without Race. N Engl J Med. 2021; 385(19):1737-1749. PMC: 8822996. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2102953. View

Upchurch Jr G, Escobar G, Azizzadeh A, Beck A, Conrad M, Matsumura J . Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2020; 73(1S):55S-83S. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.05.076. View

Nekoui M, Pirruccello J, Di Achille P, Choi S, Friedman S, Nauffal V . Spatially Distinct Genetic Determinants of Aortic Dimensions Influence Risks of Aneurysm and Stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022; 80(5):486-497. PMC: 11216157. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.05.024. View

Kim J, Kim K, Lindsay M, MacGillivray T, Isselbacher E, Cambria R . Risk of rupture or dissection in descending thoracic aortic aneurysm. Circulation. 2015; 132(17):1620-9. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.015177. View

Larsson E, Vishnevskaya L, Kalin B, Granath F, Swedenborg J, Hultgren R . High frequency of thoracic aneurysms in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Surg. 2010; 253(1):180-4. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d96498. View

Soden P, Zettervall S, Ultee K, Darling J, Buck D, Hile C . Outcomes for symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Vasc Surg. 2016; 64(2):297-305. PMC: 5065370. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.02.055. View

Shang E, Nathan D, Boonn W, Lys-Dobradin I, Fairman R, Woo E . A modern experience with saccular aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2012; 57(1):84-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.07.002. View

10.

Davies R, Goldstein L, Coady M, Tittle S, Rizzo J, Kopf G . Yearly rupture or dissection rates for thoracic aortic aneurysms: simple prediction based on size. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002; 73(1):17-27; discussion 27-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)03236-2. View

11.

Lo R, Schermerhorn M . Abdominal aortic aneurysms in women. J Vasc Surg. 2016; 63(3):839-44. PMC: 4769685. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.10.087. View

12.

Ouriel K . The PIVOTAL study: a randomized comparison of endovascular repair versus surveillance in patients with smaller abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2009; 49(1):266-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.11.048. View

13.

Natsume K, Shiiya N, Takehara Y, Sugiyama M, Satoh H, Yamashita K . Characterizing saccular aortic arch aneurysms from the geometry-flow dynamics relationship. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016; 153(6):1413-1420.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.11.032. View

14.

Rastogi V, Marcaccio C, Kim N, Patel P, Anjorin A, Zettervall S . The effect of supraceliac versus infraceliac landing zone on outcomes following fenestrated endovascular repair of juxta-/pararenal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2022; 77(1):9-19.e2. PMC: 9789162. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.08.007. View

15.

Patel P, de Guerre L, Marcaccio C, Dansey K, Li C, Lo R . Sex-specific criteria for repair should be utilized in patients undergoing aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2021; 75(2):515-525. PMC: 8963251. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.08.060. View

16.

Karthaus E, Tong T, Vahl A, Hamming J . Saccular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Patient Characteristics, Clinical Presentation, Treatment, and Outcomes in the Netherlands. Ann Surg. 2019; 270(5):852-858. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003529. View

17.

Patel P, Marcaccio C, Swerdlow N, ODonnell T, Rastogi V, Marino R . Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm life-altering events following endovascular aortic repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative. J Vasc Surg. 2023; 78(2):269-277.e3. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.03.499. View

18.

Chen J, Zafar M, Wu J, Li Y, Rizzo J, Papanikolaou D . Increased Virulence of Descending Thoracic and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms in Women. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020; 112(1):45-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.08.026. View

19.

von Elm E, Altman D, Egger M, Pocock S, Gotzsche P, Vandenbroucke J . Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007; 335(7624):806-8. PMC: 2034723. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD. View

20.

Kristmundsson T, Dias N, Resch T, Sonesson B . Morphology of Small Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Should be Considered before Continued Ultrasound Surveillance. Ann Vasc Surg. 2015; 31:18-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.09.016. View