» Articles » PMID: 37650983

Trends in Outcomes of 862 Giant Hiatus Hernia Repairs over 30 years

Overview
Journal Hernia
Publisher Springer
Date 2023 Aug 31
PMID 37650983
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Laparoscopic giant hiatus hernia repair is technically difficult with ongoing debate regarding the most effective surgical technique. Repair of small hernia has been well described but data for giant hernia is variable. This study evaluated trends in outcomes of laparoscopic non-mesh repair of giant paraesophageal hernia (PEH) over 30 years.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of a single-surgeon prospective database. Laparoscopic non-mesh repairs for giant PEH between 1991 and 2021 included. Three-hundred-sixty-degree fundoplication was performed routinely, evolving into "composite repair" (esophagopexy and cardiopexy to the right crus). Cases were chronologically divided into tertiles based on operation date (Group 1, 1991-2002; Group 2, 2003-2012; Group 3, 2012-2021) with trends in casemix, operative factors and outcomes evaluated. Hernia recurrence was plotted using weighted moving average and cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis.

Results: 862 giant PEH repairs met selection criteria. There was an increasing proportion of "composite repair" after the first decade (Group 1, 2.7%; Group 2, 81.9%; Group 3, 100%; p < 0.001). There were less anatomical hernia recurrence (Group 1, 36.6%; Group 2, 22.9%; Group 3, 22.7%; p < 0.001) and symptomatic recurrence (Group 1, 34.2%; Group 2, 21.9%; Group 3, 7%; p < 0.001) over time. The incidence of anatomical recurrence declined over time, decreasing from 30.8% and plateauing below 17.6% near the study's end. Median followup (months) in the first decade was higher but followup between the latter two decades comparable (Group 1, 49 [IQR 20, 81]; Group 2, 30 [IQR 15, 65]; Group 3, 24 [14, 56]; p < 0.001). There were 10 (1.2%) Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III complications including two perioperative deaths (0.2%).

Conclusion: Hernia recurrence rates decreased with increasing case volume. This coincided with the increasing adoption of "composite repair", supporting the possible improvement in recurrence rates with this approach.

Citing Articles

Does practice make perfect? Studying the relationship between surgeon experience and patient outcomes for paraesophageal hernia repairs.

Chatha H, Pawar O, Boutros C, Khan S, Wieland P, Levine I Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(10):6017-6025.

PMID: 39107480 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11122-0.


Recurrence in Paraesophageal Hernia: Patient Factors and Composite Surgical Repair in 862 Cases.

Nguyen C, Tovmassian D, Zhou M, Seyfi D, Isaacs A, Gooley S J Gastrointest Surg. 2023; 27(12):2733-2742.

PMID: 37962716 PMC: 10837213. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05856-w.

References
1.
Hashemi M, Peters J, DeMeester T, Huprich J, Quek M, Hagen J . Laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernia: objective followup reveals high recurrence rate. J Am Coll Surg. 2000; 190(5):553-60; discussion 560-1. DOI: 10.1016/s1072-7515(00)00260-x. View

2.
Dallemagne B, Kohnen L, Perretta S, Weerts J, Markiewicz S, Jehaes C . Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. Long-term follow-up reveals good clinical outcome despite high radiological recurrence rate. Ann Surg. 2011; 253(2):291-6. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ff44c0. View

3.
Oelschlager B, Pellegrini C, Hunter J, Brunt M, Soper N, Sheppard B . Biologic prosthesis to prevent recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: long-term follow-up from a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2011; 213(4):461-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.05.017. View

4.
Frantzides C, Carlson M, Loizides S, Papafili A, Luu M, Roberts J . Hiatal hernia repair with mesh: a survey of SAGES members. Surg Endosc. 2009; 24(5):1017-24. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0718-6. View

5.
Kuster G, Gilroy S . Laparoscopic technique for repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernias. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1993; 3(4):331-8. DOI: 10.1089/lps.1993.3.331. View