» Articles » PMID: 37650034

Attenuation of Neuromuscular Fatigue by Ischemic Preconditioning with Moderate Cuff Pressure is Not Related to Muscle Oxygen Saturation in Men

Overview
Journal Int J Exerc Sci
Date 2023 Aug 31
PMID 37650034
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) has been an excellent strategy for enhancing sports performance recovery, although there is still no consensus on the ideal protocol. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of IPC with different cuff pressures (low pressure, medium pressure, and high pressure) on the attenuation of neuromuscular fatigue after an isometric test protocol. And to verify whether this improvement was related to muscle oxygen saturation during the test protocol. Thirty males (18-35 years old) with experience in resistance training were allocated to three different groups: low pressure (20 mmHg), medium pressure (100 mmHg), and high pressure (190 mmHg). The individual occlusion pressure of each participant was identified using ultrasound. Each participant performed two test protocols (8 maximal isometric contractions lasting 20-s with a 10-s rest interval) in an extension chair; after the first test protocol, the participant received the IPC intervention with a low, medium, or high cuff pressure or received the noncuff intervention (randomized order). Only the medium-pressure group showed a smaller decrease in mean force change compared to the no-cuff condition (-4.40% vs. -13.10%, p=0.01, respectively), and the low- and high-pressure groups did not exhibit significant pressure differences (IPC vs. noncuff: -8.40% vs. -13.10%, p=0.11 and -9.10% vs. -14.70%, p=0.12, respectively). Muscle oxygen saturation across test protocols showed no significant differences in all IPC conditions (p>0.05). Although, IPC with medium pressure was effective at optimizing the recovery of neuromuscular performance, this improvement is not related to an increase in muscle oxygen saturation during exercise.

Citing Articles

Evaluating Local Muscle Oxygen Saturation: Ischemic Preconditioning Protocols and the Myth of Overcompensation.

Marocolo M, Arriel R, Guedes G, Meireles A, Krzysztofik M, Chycki J J Hum Kinet. 2025; 95:71-82.

PMID: 39944970 PMC: 11812166. DOI: 10.5114/jhk/194066.

References
1.
Johnson S, Stone W, Bunn J, Lyons T, Navalta J . New Author Guidelines in Statistical Reporting: Embracing an Era Beyond p < .05. Int J Exerc Sci. 2020; 13(1):1-5. PMC: 7523905. DOI: 10.70252/HMZN3851. View

2.
Iida H, Kurano M, Takano H, Kubota N, Morita T, Meguro K . Hemodynamic and neurohumoral responses to the restriction of femoral blood flow by KAATSU in healthy subjects. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007; 100(3):275-85. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-007-0430-y. View

3.
Wilk M, Krzysztofik M, Jarosz J, Krol P, Leznicka K, Zajac A . Impact of Ischemic Intra-Conditioning on Power Output and Bar Velocity of the Upper Limbs. Front Physiol. 2021; 12:626915. PMC: 7947627. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.626915. View

4.
Halley S, Marshall P, Siegler J . The effect of IPC on central and peripheral fatiguing mechanisms in humans following maximal single limb isokinetic exercise. Physiol Rep. 2019; 7(8):e14063. PMC: 6483935. DOI: 10.14814/phy2.14063. View

5.
Salvador A, de Aguiar R, Lisboa F, Pereira K, Cruz R, Caputo F . Ischemic Preconditioning and Exercise Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015; 11(1):4-14. DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2015-0204. View