» Articles » PMID: 37649337

Determinants of Acute Irreversible Electroporation Lesion Characteristics After Pulsed Field Ablation: the Role of Voltage, Contact, and Adipose Interference

Abstract

Aims: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a non-thermal ablative approach in which cardiomyocyte death is obtained through irreversible electroporation (IRE). Data correlating the biophysical characteristics of IRE and lesion characteristics are limited. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of different procedural parameters [voltage, number of cycles (NoCs), and contact] on lesion characteristics in a vegetal and animal model for IRE.

Methods And Results: Two hundred and four Russet potatoes were used. Pulsed field ablation lesions were delivered on 3 cm cored potato specimens using a multi-electrode circular catheter with its dedicated IRE generator. Different voltage (from 300 to 1200 V) and NoC (from 1 to 5×) protocols were used. The impact of 0.5 and 1 mm catheter-to-specimen distances was tested. A swine animal model was then used to validate the results observed in the vegetable model. The association between voltage, the NoCs, distance, and lesion depth was assessed through linear regression. An almost perfect linear association between lesion depth and voltage was observed (R2 = 0.95; P < 0.001). A similarly linear relationship was observed between the NoCs and the lesion depth (R2 = 0.73; P < 0.001). Compared with controls at full contact, a significant dampening on lesion depth was observed at 0.5 mm distance (1000 V 2×: 2.11 ± 0.12 vs. 0.36 ± 0.04, P < 0.001; 2.63 ± 0.10 vs. 0.43 ± 0.08, P < 0.001). No lesions were observed at 1.0 mm distance.

Conclusion: In a vegetal and animal model for IRE assessment, PFA lesion characteristics were found to be strongly dependent on voltage settings and the NoCs, with a quasi-linear relationship. The lack of catheter contact was associated with a dampening in lesion depth.

Citing Articles

Pulsed field ablation in atrial fibrillation ablation: where are we and where are we going?.

Schiavone M, Tondo C Eur Heart J Suppl. 2025; 27(Suppl 1):i167-i170.

PMID: 39980779 PMC: 11836714. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae103.


Left atrial intramyocardial fat at pulmonary vein reconnection sites during atrial fibrillation redo ablation.

Landra F, Saglietto A, Falasconi G, Penela D, Soto-Iglesias D, Curti E Europace. 2025; 27(2).

PMID: 39973295 PMC: 11878564. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euaf038.


Effects of key parameters on pulsed field ablation of atrial fibrillation: potato experiments.

Li Y, Xuan F, Zhang D, Sun M, Zhang P, Zhang Q Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025; 12:1525762.

PMID: 39968341 PMC: 11832666. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1525762.


Pulmonary vein reconnection rates after pulse field ablation: time for a reality check?.

Gasperetti A, Di Biase L Europace. 2025; 27(2).

PMID: 39824176 PMC: 11795646. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euaf014.


Cardiac selectivity in pulsed field ablation.

Meng F, Jin S, Liu N Curr Opin Cardiol. 2024; 40(1):37-41.

PMID: 39611738 PMC: 11623377. DOI: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000001183.


References
1.
Koruth J, Kuroki K, Iwasawa J, Enomoto Y, Viswanathan R, Brose R . Preclinical Evaluation of Pulsed Field Ablation: Electrophysiological and Histological Assessment of Thoracic Vein Isolation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019; 12(12):e007781. PMC: 6924932. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007781. View

2.
Adelino R, Combes S, El Bouazzaoui R, Albenque J, Combes N, Boveda S . Pulsed-field ablation of recurrent right atrial tachycardia: expanding the use of electroporation beyond atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2022; 25(4):1512. PMC: 10105872. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euac198. View

3.
Gomez Galindo F, Dejmek P, Lundgren K, Rasmusson A, Vicente A, Moritz T . Metabolomic evaluation of pulsed electric field-induced stress on potato tissue. Planta. 2009; 230(3):469-79. DOI: 10.1007/s00425-009-0950-2. View

4.
Ouss A, van Stratum L, van der Voort P, Dekker L . First in human pulsed field ablation to treat scar-related ventricular tachycardia in ischemic heart disease: a case report. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022; 66(3):509-510. DOI: 10.1007/s10840-022-01407-6. View

5.
Lozano-Granero C, Hirokami J, Franco E, Tohoku S, Matia-Frances R, Schmidt B . Case Series of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation With Pulsed-Field Ablation: Pushing Technology Further (Into the Ventricle). JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2023; 9(9):1990-1994. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2023.03.024. View