» Articles » PMID: 37648949

End-of-Life Care Education As Blended Learning Approach For General Practitioners: a Scoping Review

Overview
Journal J Cancer Educ
Publisher Springer
Date 2023 Aug 30
PMID 37648949
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

General practitioners (GPs) are critical in providing primary palliative care in the community. Apprehensions about managing a dying person at home, difficulties in goals of care discussion, limited resources and lack of palliative care education often hinder end-of-life care provision in the community. This review focused on the end-of-life care training programs accessed by GPs and sought to understand if the training programs' content and mode of delivery aligned with their preferred needs. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched to identify articles published in English between 01 January 1990 and 30 September 2022. Additionally, searches were conducted using SCOPUS, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane database using free texts. The reviewers screened the titles, abstracts, and full text to identify eligible studies and extracted textual data to analyse and generate themes. Out of 5532 citations initially accessed, 17 studies were included in the review. Six themes were generated: knowledge translation, skill development, a change in attitude, self-efficacy, satisfaction, and patient outcomes. The GPs' end-of-life care knowledge, skills, attitude, self-efficacy, and patient outcomes were better when their training had a combination of small-group interactive workshops, trigger case-based reflective learning, mentor-facilitated experiential learning, web-based modules, and peer learning. The synthesis of review findings supports blended learning as a training approach for general the practitioners' end-of-life care education as it facilitates learning and patient outcomes.

Citing Articles

Palliative care education and knowledge transfer into practice - a multicenter survey among medical students and resident physicians in Germany using a mixed-methods design.

Dronia M, Dillen K, Elsner F, Schallenburger M, Neukirchen M, Hagemeier A GMS J Med Educ. 2024; 41(3):Doc27.

PMID: 39131897 PMC: 11310786. DOI: 10.3205/zma001682.

References
1.
Sleeman K, de Brito M, Etkind S, Nkhoma K, Guo P, Higginson I . The escalating global burden of serious health-related suffering: projections to 2060 by world regions, age groups, and health conditions. Lancet Glob Health. 2019; 7(7):e883-e892. PMC: 6560023. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30172-X. View

2.
Connor S, Centeno C, Garralda E, Clelland D, Clark D . Estimating the Number of Patients Receiving Specialized Palliative Care Globally in 2017. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020; 61(4):812-816. PMC: 8012880. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.09.036. View

3.
Cassel J, Kerr K, McClish D, Skoro N, Johnson S, Wanke C . Effect of a Home-Based Palliative Care Program on Healthcare Use and Costs. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016; 64(11):2288-2295. PMC: 5118096. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.14354. View

4.
Cai J, Zhang L, Guerriere D, Fan H, Coyte P . Where Do Cancer Patients in Receipt of Home-Based Palliative Care Prefer to Die and What Are the Determinants of a Preference for a Home Death?. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(1). PMC: 7796022. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18010235. View

5.
Ng A, Wong F . Effects of a Home-Based Palliative Heart Failure Program on Quality of Life, Symptom Burden, Satisfaction and Caregiver Burden: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017; 55(1):1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.07.047. View