Developing and Assessing a Kin Keeping Scale with Application to Identifying Central Influencers in African American Family Networks

Overview

Journal J Community Genet

Publisher Springer

Specialty Health Services

Date 2023 Aug 30

PMID 37648941

Authors

Caitlin G Allen

Colleen M McBride

Cam Escoffery

Yue Guan

Clarissa Hood

Jingsong Zaho

Gene Brody

Weihua An

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Promoting family communication about inherited disease risk is an arena in which family systems theory is highly relevant. One family systems' construct that can support promotion of family communication regarding inherited disease risk is the notion of "kin keeping." However, kin keeping and whether it might be capitalized on to encourage family communication about inherited risk has been understudied. The goal of this report was to propose a broadened conceptualization of kin keeping that distinguishes between a structural functional perspective (role conceptualization) and transitional behaviors (skill conceptualization), and to develop and evaluate a scale that would enable this assertion to be tested among a sample of African American community health workers. We developed a scale using four steps: item development using concept analysis and content validity, scale development among a national sample (n = 312), scale evaluation using exploratory factor analysis (n = 52), and scale reduction. We then posed suppositions of associations that would indicate whether the developed kin keeping measure was assessing a specific family role or set of behaviors. Our results included the development of the first quantitative measure of kin keeping (9- and 15-item scales). Model fit for 9-item scale (CFI = 0.97, AFGI = 0.89, RMSEA = 0.09, SMRM = 0.06) and model fit for 15-item scale (CFI = 0.97, AFGI = 0.89, RMSEA = 0.06, SMRM = 0.05). These findings allow us to move toward more rigorous research about the role of kin keeping on information sharing and health decision making. Results also suggest that, contrary to the historical structural functional conceptualization of kin keeping as a role, kin keeping might also be conceptualized as a behavior or set of modifiable behaviors. Ultimately, the kin keeping scale could be used to operationalize kin keeping in various theoretical models and frameworks, guide intervention development to encourage or train for kin keeping behaviors, and test assumptions of whether families vary in the density of kin keeping.

References

Bastian L, Fish L, Peterson B, Biddle A, Garst J, Lyna P . Assessment of the impact of adjunctive proactive telephone counseling to promote smoking cessation among lung cancer patients' social networks. Am J Health Promot. 2013; 27(3):181-90. DOI: 10.4278/ajhp.101122-QUAN-387. View

Gaff C, Clarke A, Atkinson P, Sivell S, Elwyn G, Iredale R . Process and outcome in communication of genetic information within families: a systematic review. Eur J Hum Genet. 2007; 15(10):999-1011. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201883. View

. Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: genetic testing strategies in newly diagnosed individuals with colorectal cancer aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality from Lynch syndrome in relatives. Genet Med. 2009; 11(1):35-41. PMC: 2743612. DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31818fa2ff. View

Peters J, Hoskins L, Prindiville S, Kenen R, Greene M . Evolution of the colored eco-genetic relationship map (CEGRM) for assessing social functioning in women in hereditary breast-ovarian (HBOC) families. J Genet Couns. 2006; 15(6):477-89. DOI: 10.1007/s10897-006-9042-7. View

Yoon P, Scheuner M, Gwinn M, Faucett A, Khoury M . Can family history be used as a tool for public health and preventive medicine?. Genet Med. 2002; 4(4):304-10. DOI: 10.1097/00125817-200207000-00009. View

Peters J, Kenen R, Hoskins L, Glenn G, Kratz C, Greene M . Close ties: an exploratory Colored Eco-Genetic Relationship Map (CEGRM) study of social connections of men in Familial Testicular Cancer (FTC) families. Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2012; 10:2. PMC: 3323467. DOI: 10.1186/1897-4287-10-2. View

Williams K, Mabiso A, Jackson T, Lawshe D, Maurer J . Breast cancer and cervical cancer control program enrollees inform the kin keeper curriculum. J Cancer Educ. 2009; 24(4):257-60. DOI: 10.1080/08858190902972939. View

Pyeritz R . The family history: the first genetic test, and still useful after all those years?. Genet Med. 2012; 14(1):3-9. DOI: 10.1038/gim.0b013e3182310bcf. View

Brownstein J, Hirsch G, Rosenthal E, Rush C . Community health workers "101" for primary care providers and other stakeholders in health care systems. J Ambul Care Manage. 2011; 34(3):210-20. DOI: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e31821c645d. View

10.

Zimet G, Powell S, Farley G, WERKMAN S, Berkoff K . Psychometric characteristics of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. J Pers Assess. 1990; 55(3-4):610-7. DOI: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674095. View

11.

Heijer M, Seynaeve C, Vanheusden K, Duivenvoorden H, Bartels C, Menke-Pluymers M . Psychological distress in women at risk for hereditary breast cancer: the role of family communication and perceived social support. Psychooncology. 2010; 20(12):1317-23. DOI: 10.1002/pon.1850. View

12.

Baroutsou V, Underhill-Blazey M, Appenzeller-Herzog C, Katapodi M . Interventions Facilitating Family Communication of Genetic Testing Results and Cascade Screening in Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer or Lynch Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(4). PMC: 7926393. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040925. View

13.

Guttmacher A, Collins F, Carmona R . The family history--more important than ever. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351(22):2333-6. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsb042979. View

14.

Peters J, Kenen R, Hoskins L, Koehly L, Graubard B, Loud J . Unpacking the blockers: understanding perceptions and social constraints of health communication in hereditary breast ovarian cancer (HBOC) susceptibility families. J Genet Couns. 2011; 20(5):450-64. PMC: 3412366. DOI: 10.1007/s10897-011-9370-0. View

15.

House J, Landis K, Umberson D . Social relationships and health. Science. 1988; 241(4865):540-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.3399889. View

16.

Koehly L, Peters J, Kenen R, Hoskins L, Ersig A, Kuhn N . Characteristics of health information gatherers, disseminators, and blockers within families at risk of hereditary cancer: implications for family health communication interventions. Am J Public Health. 2009; 99(12):2203-9. PMC: 2775786. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.154096. View

17.

Ake J, Lin J, Wilkinson A, Koehly L . Motivating Mexican American adults to share family history with healthcare providers. Prev Med Rep. 2021; 22:101384. PMC: 8099618. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101384. View

18.

McBride C, Persky S, Wagner L, Faith M, Ward D . Effects of providing personalized feedback of child's obesity risk on mothers' food choices using a virtual reality buffet. Int J Obes (Lond). 2013; 37(10):1322-7. PMC: 9812339. DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2013.87. View

19.

Qureshi N, Kai J . Informing patients of familial diabetes mellitus risk: How do they respond? A cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008; 8:37. PMC: 2275238. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-37. View

20.

Rose P, Murphy M, Munafo M, Chapman C, Mortensen N, Lucassen A . Improving the ascertainment of families at high risk of colorectal cancer: a prospective GP register study. Br J Gen Pract. 2004; 54(501):267-71. PMC: 1314851. View