» Articles » PMID: 37647294

Reliability and Measurement Properties of Upper Cervical Flexion-extension Range of Motion Testing in People with Cervicogenic Headache and Asymptomatic Controls

Overview
Date 2023 Aug 30
PMID 37647294
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The objective was to determine reliability of sagittal plane range of motion (ROM) assessment in a healthy population and in people with cervicogenic headache (CGH).

Methods: Upper cervical flexion/extension ROM was measured using an iPhone magnetometer sensor and retraction/protraction ROM measured by linear displacement. Two independent raters evaluated these movements in 33 subjects with CGH and 33 age and gender matched asymptomatic healthy controls on two occasions. Measurement procedures were standardized; and the order of testing randomized. Reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC) were calculated.

Results: Subjects comprised 30 females and 36 males. The iPhone method demonstrated high reliability (ICC >0.82) with SEM values ranging from 0.62 to 1.0 and MDC values ranging from 1.70 to 4.81 respectively. Evaluation of linear displacement demonstrated moderate reliability (ICC >64). with SEM values ranging from 0.38 to 1.91 and MDC values ranging from 1.05 to 1.63 respectively. Compared to healthy controls, upper cervical flexion, retraction and protraction ROM was significantly less in the CGH group with mean difference of 6.50°, 1.52 cm and 2.34 cm respectively.

Discussion: Upper cervical spine sagittal plane ROM can be measured with moderate to high reliability and was found to be more restricted in people with CGH.

References
1.
Vernon H, Lawson G . Development of the headache activities of daily living index: initial validity study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2015; 38(2):102-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.12.002. View

2.
Cote P, Yu H, Shearer H, Randhawa K, Wong J, Mior S . Non-pharmacological management of persistent headaches associated with neck pain: A clinical practice guideline from the Ontario protocol for traffic injury management (OPTIMa) collaboration. Eur J Pain. 2019; 23(6):1051-1070. DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1374. View

3.
Schwab J, DiAngelo D, Foley K . Motion compensation associated with single-level cervical fusion: where does the lost motion go?. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(21):2439-48. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000239125.54761.23. View

4.
Hanten W, Olson S, Russell J, Lucio R, Campbell A . Total head excursion and resting head posture: normal and patient comparisons. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000; 81(1):62-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(00)90223-5. View

5.
Ghorbani F, Kamyab M, Azadinia F . Smartphone Applications as a Suitable Alternative to CROM Device and Inclinometers in Assessing the Cervical Range of Motion in Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain. J Chiropr Med. 2020; 19(1):38-48. PMC: 7647697. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2019.10.004. View